mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding with toy surrogate models in machine learning

arXiv 2410.05675 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the natural and social sciences, it is common to use toy models -- extremely simple and highly idealized representations -- to understand complex phenomena. Some of the simple surrogate models used to understand opaque machine learning (ML) models, such as rule lists and sparse decision trees, bear some resemblance to scientific toy models. They allow non-experts to understand how an opaque ML model works globally via a much simpler model that highlights the most relevant features of the input space and their effect on the output. The obvious difference is that the common target of a toy and a full-scale model in the sciences is some phenomenon in the world, while the target of a surrogate model is another model. This essential difference makes toy surrogate models (TSMs) a new object of study for theories of understanding, one that is not easily accommodated under current analyses. This paper provides an account of what it means to understand an opaque ML model globally with the aid of such simple models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 125 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.

Builds on

35 of 125 references.

References · 35

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  5. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  6. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  7. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  8. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  9. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  10. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  11. 2017CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learningcited by 461
  12. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
23 more
  1. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  2. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
  3. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  4. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
  5. 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 147
  6. 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
  7. 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 125
  8. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
  9. 2020Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approachcited by 90
  10. 2019On the Existence of Simpler Machine Learning Modelscited by 89
  11. 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
  12. 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
  13. 2017Beyond Sparsity: Tree Regularization of Deep Models for Interpretabilitycited by 68
  14. 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
  15. 2017Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillationcited by 62
  16. 2021Counterfactuals and Causability in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Theory, Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 59
  17. 2020The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 54
  18. 2018Interpretable to Whom? A Role-based Model for Analyzing Interpretable Machine Learning Systemscited by 48
  19. 2017Interpreting Blackbox Models via Model Extractioncited by 44
  20. 2018A review of possible effects of cognitive biases on the interpretation of rule-based machine learning modelscited by 22
  21. 2017Simple rules for complex decisionscited by 15
  22. 2018On Cognitive Preferences and the Plausibility of Rule-based Modelscited by 14
  23. 2018Interpreting Deep Classifier by Visual Distillation of Dark Knowledgecited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.