mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ProtoNAM: Prototypical Neural Additive Models for Interpretable Deep Tabular Learning

arXiv 2410.04723 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generalized additive models (GAMs) have long been a powerful white-box tool for the intelligible analysis of tabular data, revealing the influence of each feature on the model predictions. Despite the success of neural networks (NNs) in various domains, their application as NN-based GAMs in tabular data analysis remains suboptimal compared to tree-based ones, and the opacity of encoders in NN-GAMs also prevents users from understanding how networks learn the functions. In this work, we propose a new deep tabular learning method, termed Prototypical Neural Additive Model (ProtoNAM), which introduces prototypes into neural networks in the framework of GAMs. With the introduced prototype-based feature activation, ProtoNAM can flexibly model the irregular mapping from tabular features to the outputs while maintaining the explainability of the final prediction. We also propose a gradient-boosting inspired hierarchical shape function modeling method, facilitating the discovery of complex feature patterns and bringing transparency into the learning process of each network layer. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that ProtoNAM outperforms all existing NN-based GAMs, while providing additional insights into the shape function learned for each feature. The source code of ProtoNAM is available at urlhttps://github.com/Teddy-XiongGZ/ProtoNAM.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  3. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
  4. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  5. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
  6. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  7. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
  8. 2017Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  9. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
  10. 2017Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictionscited by 234
  11. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
  12. 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 200
10 more
  1. 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 151
  2. 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
  3. 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
  4. 2015The Bayesian Case Model: A Generative Approach for Case-Based Reasoning and Prototype Classificationcited by 76
  5. 2019Interpretable and Steerable Sequence Learning via Prototypescited by 72
  6. 2019Interpretable Image Recognition with Hierarchical Prototypescited by 64
  7. 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
  8. 2021DANets: Deep Abstract Networks for Tabular Data Classification and Regressioncited by 50
  9. 2020How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?cited by 44
  10. 2024Gaussian Process Neural Additive Modelscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.