mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Domains as Objectives: Domain-Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization through Explicit Multi-Domain Convex Coverage Set Learning

arXiv 2410.04719 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024cs.ROcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL

Abstract (arXiv)

The problem of uncertainty is a feature of real world robotics problems and any control framework must contend with it in order to succeed in real applications tasks. Reinforcement Learning is no different, and epistemic uncertainty arising from model uncertainty or misspecification is a challenge well captured by the sim-to-real gap. A simple solution to this issue is domain randomization (DR), which unfortunately can result in conservative agents. As a remedy to this conservativeness, the use of universal policies that take additional information about the randomized domain has risen as an alternative solution, along with recurrent neural network-based controllers. Uncertainty-aware universal policies present a particularly compelling solution able to account for system identification uncertainties during deployment. In this paper, we reveal that the challenge of efficiently optimizing uncertainty-aware policies can be fundamentally reframed as solving the convex coverage set (CCS) problem within a multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) context. By introducing a novel Markov decision process (MDP) framework where each domain's performance is treated as an independent objective, we unify the training of uncertainty-aware policies with MORL approaches. This connection enables the application of MORL algorithms for domain randomization (DR), allowing for more efficient policy optimization. To illustrate this, we focus on the linear utility function, which aligns with the expectation in DR formulations, and propose a series of algorithms adapted from the MORL literature to solve the CCS, demonstrating their ability to enhance the performance of uncertainty-aware policies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

36 of 48 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  3. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  4. 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 687
  5. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 672
  6. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
  7. 2019Efficient Off-Policy Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Context Variablescited by 389
  8. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  9. 2018Closing the Sim-to-Real Loop: Adapting Simulation Randomization with Real World Experiencecited by 217
  10. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
  11. 2018Sim-to-Real via Sim-to-Sim: Data-efficient Robotic Grasping via Randomized-to-Canonical Adaptation Networkscited by 174
  12. 2019Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Controlcited by 174
24 more
  1. 2019Active Domain Randomizationcited by 170
  2. 2017Preparing for the Unknown: Learning a Universal Policy with Online System Identificationcited by 141
  3. 2016EPOpt: Learning Robust Neural Network Policies Using Model Ensemblescited by 138
  4. 2018Dynamic Weights in Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 100
  5. 2019BayesSim: adaptive domain randomization via probabilistic inference for robotics simulatorscited by 85
  6. 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
  7. 2021Understanding Domain Randomization for Sim-to-real Transfercited by 80
  8. 2019Robust Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Model Misspecificationcited by 78
  9. 2019Sim2real transfer learning for 3D human pose estimation: motion to the rescuecited by 76
  10. 2019ROBEL: Robotics Benchmarks for Learning with Low-Cost Robotscited by 72
  11. 2020Continual Adaptation of Visual Representations via Domain Randomization and Meta-learningcited by 55
  12. 2020Data-efficient Domain Randomization with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 47
  13. 2018Hardware Conditioned Policies for Multi-Robot Transfer Learningcited by 46
  14. 2018Learning To Simulatecited by 44
  15. 2018Policy Transfer with Strategy Optimizationcited by 43
  16. 2019Beyond Confidence Regions: Tight Bayesian Ambiguity Sets for Robust MDPscited by 40
  17. 2019A Bayesian Approach to Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  18. 2020Model-based Adversarial Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  19. 2021Recurrent Off-policy Baselines for Memory-based Continuous Controlcited by 21
  20. 2020Inferring the Material Properties of Granular Media for Robotic Taskscited by 20
  21. 2022Robust Policy Learning over Multiple Uncertainty Setscited by 18
  22. 2020DISCO: Double Likelihood-free Inference Stochastic Controlcited by 9
  23. 2022Uncertainty Aware System Identification with Universal Policiescited by 2
  24. 2021Not Only Domain Randomization: Universal Policy with Embedding System Identificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Safe Domain Randomization via Uncertainty-Aware Out-of-Distribution Detection and Policy Adaptation
  2. 2025Safe Continual Domain Adaptation after Sim2Real Transfer of Reinforcement Learning Policies in Robotics
  3. 2025Flow-based Domain Randomization for Learning and Sequencing Robotic Skills
  4. 2022Domain Generalization for Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2024Absolute State-wise Constrained Policy Optimization: High-Probability State-wise Constraints Satisfaction
  6. 2025Uncertainty-Aware Robotic World Model Makes Offline Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Work on Real Robots
  7. 2026All Models are Wrong, Knowing Where is Useful: On Model Uncertainty in Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Beyond Static Datasets: Robust Offline Policy Optimization via Vetted Synthetic Transitions