Towards an Improved Metric for Evaluating Disentangled Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Disentangled representation learning plays a pivotal role in making representations controllable, interpretable and transferable. Despite its significance in the domain, the quest for reliable and consistent quantitative disentanglement metric remains a major challenge. This stems from the utilisation of diverse metrics measuring different properties and the potential bias introduced by their design. Our work undertakes a comprehensive examination of existing popular disentanglement evaluation metrics, comparing them in terms of measuring aspects of disentanglement (viz. Modularity, Compactness, and Explicitness), detecting the factor-code relationship, and describing the degree of disentanglement. We propose a new framework for quantifying disentanglement, introducing a metric entitled EDI, that leverages the intuitive concept of exclusivity and improved factor-code relationship to minimize ad-hoc decisions. An in-depth analysis reveals that EDI measures essential properties while offering more stability than existing metrics, advocating for its adoption as a standardised approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
6 of 18 references.
References · 6
- 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
- 2017Variational Inference of Disentangled Latent Concepts from Unlabeled Observationscited by 240
- 2018Learning Deep Disentangled Embeddings with the F-Statistic Losscited by 101
- 2020Measuring Disentanglement: A Review of Metricscited by 69
- 2020Progressive Learning and Disentanglement of Hierarchical Representationscited by 30
- 2019A Preliminary Study of Disentanglement With Insights on the Inadequacy of Metricscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.