mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Long-Sequence Recommendation Models Need Decoupled Embeddings

arXiv 2410.02604 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2024cs.IR cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lifelong user behavior sequences are crucial for capturing user interests and predicting user responses in modern recommendation systems. A two-stage paradigm is typically adopted to handle these long sequences: a subset of relevant behaviors is first searched from the original long sequences via an attention mechanism in the first stage and then aggregated with the target item to construct a discriminative representation for prediction in the second stage. In this work, we identify and characterize, for the first time, a neglected deficiency in existing long-sequence recommendation models: a single set of embeddings struggles with learning both attention and representation, leading to interference between these two processes. Initial attempts to address this issue with some common methods (e.g., linear projections -- a technique borrowed from language processing) proved ineffective, shedding light on the unique challenges of recommendation models. To overcome this, we propose the Decoupled Attention and Representation Embeddings (DARE) model, where two distinct embedding tables are initialized and learned separately to fully decouple attention and representation. Extensive experiments and analysis demonstrate that DARE provides more accurate searches of correlated behaviors and outperforms baselines with AUC gains up to 0.9% on public datasets and notable improvements on Tencent's advertising platform. Furthermore, decoupling embedding spaces allows us to reduce the attention embedding dimension and accelerate the search procedure by 50% without significant performance impact, enabling more efficient, high-performance online serving. Code in PyTorch for experiments, including model analysis, is available at https://github.com/thuml/DARE.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.

Builds on

24 of 28 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  6. 2015Image-based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutescited by 702
  7. 2017Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 541
  8. 2016Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filteringcited by 517
  9. 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 441
  10. 2018Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 336
  11. 2020Search-based User Interest Modeling with Lifelong Sequential Behavior Data for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 176
  12. 2019Behavior Sequence Transformer for E-commerce Recommendation in Alibabacited by 128
12 more
  1. 2020Neural Collaborative Filtering vs. Matrix Factorization Revisitedcited by 123
  2. 2018Learning Tree-based Deep Model for Recommender Systemscited by 99
  3. 2019Deep Session Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 64
  4. 2021End-to-End User Behavior Retrieval in Click-Through RatePrediction Modelcited by 45
  5. 2023TWIN: TWo-stage Interest Network for Lifelong User Behavior Modeling in CTR Prediction at Kuaishoucited by 40
  6. 2019Joint Optimization of Tree-based Index and Deep Model for Recommender Systemscited by 37
  7. 2024TWIN V2: Scaling Ultra-Long User Behavior Sequence Modeling for Enhanced CTR Prediction at Kuaishoucited by 30
  8. 2023On the Embedding Collapse when Scaling up Recommendation Modelscited by 29
  9. 2020Learning Optimal Tree Models Under Beam Searchcited by 26
  10. 2022Sampling Is All You Need on Modeling Long-Term User Behaviors for CTR Predictioncited by 24
  11. 2023Revisiting Neural Retrieval on Acceleratorscited by 14
  12. 2023Temporal Interest Network for User Response Predictioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.