mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions

arXiv 2410.02028 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classification is a core NLP task architecture with many potential applications. While large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. To address this gap, we propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task. Our extensive experiments and systematic comparisons with various training approaches and a representative selection of LLMs yield new insights into their application for EIC. We investigate the generalizability of these findings on five further classification tasks. To demonstrate the proposed methods and address the data shortage for empirical edit analysis, we use our best-performing EIC model to create Re3-Sci2.0, a new large-scale dataset of 1,780 scientific document revisions with over 94k labeled edits. The quality of the dataset is assessed through human evaluation. The new dataset enables an in-depth empirical study of human editing behavior in academic writing. We make our experimental framework, models and data publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 41 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  9. 2024NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Modelscited by 466
  10. 2023Text Classification via Large Language Modelscited by 104
  11. 2023Element-aware Summarization with Large Language Models: Expert-aligned Evaluation and Chain-of-Thought Methodcited by 76
  12. 2022Understanding Iterative Revision from Human-Written Textcited by 56
11 more
  1. 2022Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Reviewcited by 37
  2. 2023Merging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge for Open-Domain QAcited by 36
  3. 2023In-Context Learning for Text Classification with Many Labelscited by 35
  4. 2018Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Duplicate Question Detectioncited by 30
  5. 2022arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writingcited by 26
  6. 2023Exploring Zero and Few-shot Techniques for Intent Classificationcited by 21
  7. 2023Position: Key Claims in LLM Research Have a Long Tail of Footnotescited by 20
  8. 2024Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotationcited by 20
  9. 2017Cross-domain Semantic Parsing via Paraphrasingcited by 19
  10. 2024Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document Revisioncited by 11
  11. 2024Enhancing Low-Resource LLMs Classification with PEFT and Synthetic Datacited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

11 papers.