mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GenCLS++: Pushing the Boundaries of Generative Classification in LLMs Through Comprehensive SFT and RL Studies Across Diverse Datasets

arXiv 2504.19898 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As a fundamental task in machine learning, text classification plays a crucial role in many areas. With the rapid scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly through reinforcement learning (RL), there is a growing need for more capable discriminators. Consequently, advances in classification are becoming increasingly vital for enhancing the overall capabilities of LLMs. Traditional discriminative methods map text to labels but overlook LLMs' intrinsic generative strengths. Generative classification addresses this by prompting the model to directly output labels. However, existing studies still rely on simple SFT alone, seldom probing the interplay between training and inference prompts, and no work has systematically leveraged RL for generative text classifiers and unified SFT, RL, and inference-time prompting in one framework. We bridge this gap with GenCLS++, a framework that jointly optimizes SFT and RL while systematically exploring five high-level strategy dimensions-in-context learning variants, category definitions, explicit uncertainty labels, semantically irrelevant numeric labels, and perplexity-based decoding-during both training and inference. After an SFT "policy warm-up," we apply RL with a simple rule-based reward, yielding sizable extra gains. Across seven datasets, GenCLS++ achieves an average accuracy improvement of 3.46% relative to the naive SFT baseline; on public datasets, this improvement rises to 4.00%. Notably, unlike reasoning-intensive tasks that benefit from explicit thinking processes, we find that classification tasks perform better without such reasoning steps. These insights into the role of explicit reasoning provide valuable guidance for future LLM applications.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.

Builds on

30 of 35 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  7. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  8. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  9. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  10. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
  11. 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 861
  12. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
18 more
  1. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
  2. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  3. 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 464
  4. 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 278
  5. 2024To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningcited by 263
  6. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 239
  7. 2025Seed1.5-Thinking: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
  8. 2025MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiencycited by 125
  9. 2023Text Classification via Large Language Modelscited by 106
  10. 2023OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 85
  11. 2023Self-Evaluation Improves Selective Generation in Large Language Modelscited by 76
  12. 2023A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoningcited by 41
  13. 2023In-Context Learning for Text Classification with Many Labelscited by 35
  14. 2024Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Datacited by 32
  15. 2023Exploring Zero and Few-shot Techniques for Intent Classificationcited by 21
  16. 2024Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotationcited by 20
  17. 2024Advancing Process Verification for Large Language Models via Tree-Based Preference Learningcited by 16
  18. 2024Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024The RL/LLM Taxonomy Tree: Reviewing Synergies Between Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models
  2. 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labels
  3. 2023Generation-driven Contrastive Self-training for Zero-shot Text Classification with Instruction-following LLM
  4. 2025Generative or Discriminative? Revisiting Text Classification in the Era of Transformers
  5. 2025PRL: Prompts from Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026On Discriminative vs. Generative classifiers: Rethinking MLLMs for Action Understanding
  7. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization
  8. 2025UME-R1: Exploring Reasoning-Driven Generative Multimodal Embeddings