mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stable Offline Value Function Learning with Bisimulation-based Representations

arXiv 2410.01643 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In reinforcement learning, offline value function learning is the procedure of using an offline dataset to estimate the expected discounted return from each state when taking actions according to a fixed target policy. The stability of this procedure, i.e., whether it converges to its fixed-point, critically depends on the representations of the state-action pairs. Poorly learned representations can make value function learning unstable, or even divergent. Therefore, it is critical to stabilize value function learning by explicitly shaping the state-action representations. Recently, the class of bisimulation-based algorithms have shown promise in shaping representations for control. However, it is still unclear if this class of methods can stabilize value function learning. In this work, we investigate this question and answer it affirmatively. We introduce a bisimulation-based algorithm called kernel representations for offline policy evaluation (textsckrope). textsckrope uses a kernel to shape state-action representations such that state-action pairs that have similar immediate rewards and lead to similar next state-action pairs under the target policy also have similar representations. We show that textsckrope: 1) learns stable representations and 2) leads to lower value error than baselines. Our analysis provides new theoretical insight into the stability properties of bisimulation-based methods and suggests that practitioners can use these methods to improve the stability and accuracy of offline evaluation of reinforcement learning agents.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

Builds on

39 of 68 references.

References · 39

  1. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  4. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  5. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 424
  6. 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  7. 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 242
  8. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 170
  9. 2024Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLcited by 136
  10. 2019Scalable methods for computing state similarity in deterministic Markov Decision Processescited by 133
  11. 2021Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPscited by 128
  12. 2019Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
27 more
  1. 2021Representation Matters: Offline Pretraining for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 90
  2. 2021Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 89
  3. 2024Simplifying Deep Temporal Difference Learningcited by 71
  4. 2021DR3: Value-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Explicit Regularizationcited by 66
  5. 2021Towards Robust Bisimulation Metric Learningcited by 49
  6. 2020Provable Representation Learning for Imitation Learning via Bi-level Optimizationcited by 41
  7. 2023Proto-Value Networks: Scaling Representation Learning with Auxiliary Taskscited by 41
  8. 2022Understanding Self-Predictive Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  9. 2021Instabilities of Offline RL with Pre-Trained Neural Representationcited by 38
  10. 2019A Kernel Loss for Solving the Bellman Equationcited by 37
  11. 2021Training Larger Networks for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  12. 2021Provable Representation Learning for Imitation with Contrastive Fourier Featurescited by 34
  13. 2020Representations for Stable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
  14. 2022Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Errorcited by 31
  15. 2021Metrics and continuity in reinforcement learningcited by 26
  16. 2022Investigating the Properties of Neural Network Representations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  17. 2022Learning Bellman Complete Representations for Offline Policy Evaluationcited by 17
  18. 2022Agent-Controller Representations: Principled Offline RL with Rich Exogenous Informationcited by 15
  19. 2023TD Convergence: An Optimization Perspectivecited by 15
  20. 2022Behavior Prior Representation learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  21. 2022Approximate Policy Iteration with Bisimulation Metricscited by 11
  22. 2022Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  23. 2023Understanding and Addressing the Pitfalls of Bisimulation-based Representations in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  24. 2022Scaling Marginalized Importance Sampling to High-Dimensional State-Spaces via State Abstractioncited by 7
  25. 2024Adaptive Regularization of Representation Rank as an Implicit Constraint of Bellman Equationcited by 7
  26. 2023State-Action Similarity-Based Representations for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 3
  27. 2023A Kernel Perspective on Behavioural Metrics for Markov Decision Processescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.