Scaling Marginalized Importance Sampling to High-Dimensional State-Spaces via State Abstraction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of off-policy evaluation (OPE) in reinforcement learning (RL), where the goal is to estimate the performance of an evaluation policy, πe, using a fixed dataset, D, collected by one or more policies that may be different from πe. Current OPE algorithms may produce poor OPE estimates under policy distribution shift i.e., when the probability of a particular state-action pair occurring under πe is very different from the probability of that same pair occurring in D (Voloshin et al. 2021, Fu et al. 2021). In this work, we propose to improve the accuracy of OPE estimators by projecting the high-dimensional state-space into a low-dimensional state-space using concepts from the state abstraction literature. Specifically, we consider marginalized importance sampling (MIS) OPE algorithms which compute state-action distribution correction ratios to produce their OPE estimate. In the original ground state-space, these ratios may have high variance which may lead to high variance OPE. However, we prove that in the lower-dimensional abstract state-space the ratios can have lower variance resulting in lower variance OPE. We then highlight the challenges that arise when estimating the abstract ratios from data, identify sufficient conditions to overcome these issues, and present a minimax optimization problem whose solution yields these abstract ratios. Finally, our empirical evaluation on difficult, high-dimensional state-space OPE tasks shows that the abstract ratios can make MIS OPE estimators achieve lower mean-squared error and more robust to hyperparameter tuning than the ground ratios.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2022.
Builds on
33 of 57 references.
References · 33
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
- 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 424
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
- 2019DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Correctionscited by 254
- 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 242
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
- 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 204
- 2019Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 150
- 2019Scalable methods for computing state similarity in deterministic Markov Decision Processescited by 133
21 more
- 2020GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 122
- 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrabilitycited by 122
- 2019Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
- 2019Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Samplingcited by 118
- 2020Hyperparameter Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 113
- 2021Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 89
- 2020Off-Policy Evaluation via the Regularized Lagrangiancited by 86
- 2020GradientDICE: Rethinking Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 70
- 2022Near-optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Representation: Leveraging Variance Information with Pessimismcited by 63
- 2020Asymptotically Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation for Tabular Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2017Consistent On-Line Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 51
- 2019Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning by Bootstrapping the Covariate Shiftcited by 47
- 2021Instabilities of Offline RL with Pre-Trained Neural Representationcited by 38
- 2019Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Samplingcited by 36
- 2018Importance Sampling Policy Evaluation with an Estimated Behavior Policycited by 34
- 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning Under Value and Density-Ratio Realizability: The Power of Gapscited by 34
- 2021Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 32
- 2022A Theory of Abstraction in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2018Representation Balancing MDPs for Off-Policy Policy Evaluationcited by 20
- 2020Batch Stationary Distribution Estimationcited by 19
- 2016Learning from Conditional Distributions via Dual Embeddingscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023State-Action Similarity-Based Representations for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 3
- 2024Off-policy Evaluation with Deeply-abstracted Statescited by 2
- 2024Abstract Reward Processes: Leveraging State Abstraction for Consistent Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 1
- 2024Concept-driven Off Policy Evaluationcited by 1
- 2024Stable Offline Value Function Learning with Bisimulation-based Representationscited by 0
- 2025Where to Intervene: Action Selection in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Quotient DAGs for Off-Policy Evaluation:Forward-Flow Importance Sampling and Exact Slate Propensitiescited by 0
- 2026Quotient DAGs for Off-Policy Evaluation:Forward-Flow Importance Sampling and Exact Slate Propensities28 May 2026
- 2025Where to Intervene: Action Selection in Deep Reinforcement Learning5 Jul 2025
- 2024Concept-driven Off Policy Evaluation28 Nov 2024
- 2024Abstract Reward Processes: Leveraging State Abstraction for Consistent Off-Policy Evaluation3 Oct 2024
- 2024Stable Offline Value Function Learning with Bisimulation-based Representations2 Oct 2024
- 2024Off-policy Evaluation with Deeply-abstracted States27 Jun 2024
- 2023State-Action Similarity-Based Representations for Off-Policy Evaluation27 Oct 2023