mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Easy Come, Easy Go? Examining the Perceptions and Learning Effects of LLM-based Chatbot in the Context of Search-as-Learning

arXiv 2410.01396 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2024cs.HC cs.AI cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The cognitive process of Search-as-Learning (SAL) is most effective when searching promotes active encoding of information. The rise of LLMs-based chatbots, which provide instant answers, introduces a trade-off between efficiency and depth of processing. Such answer-centric approaches accelerate information access, but they also raise concerns about shallower learning. To examine these issues in the context of SAL, we conducted a large-scale survey of educators and students to capture perceived risks and benefits of LLM-based chatbots. In addition, we adopted the encoding-storage paradigm to design a within-subjects experiment, where participants (N=92) engaged in SAL tasks using three different modalities: books, search engines, and chatbots. Our findings provide a counterintuitive insight into stakeholder concerns: while LLM-based chatbots and search engines validated perceived benefits on learning efficiency by outperforming book-based search in immediate conceptual understanding, they did not result in a long-term inferiority as feared. Our study provides insights for designing human-AI collaborative learning systems that promote cognitive engagement by balancing learning efficiency and long-term knowledge retention.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

Builds on

8 of 75 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator Needscited by 81
  2. 2024Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language Modelscited by 51
  3. 2024AI-Augmented Brainwriting: Investigating the use of LLMs in group ideationcited by 43
  4. 2023A Comparative Study of AI-Generated (GPT-4) and Human-crafted MCQs in Programming Educationcited by 34
  5. 2024AutoTutor meets Large Language Models: A Language Model Tutor with Rich Pedagogy and Guardrailscited by 30
  6. 2023CoAIcoder: Examining the Effectiveness of AI-assisted Human-to-Human Collaboration in Qualitative Analysiscited by 25
  7. 2023GPTutor: a ChatGPT-powered programming tool for code explanationcited by 22
  8. 2024How Teachers Can Use Large Language Models and Bloom's Taxonomy to Create Educational Quizzescited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.