mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Whole-Graph Representation Learning For the Classification of Signed Networks

arXiv 2409.20073 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.NE cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graphs are ubiquitous for modeling complex systems involving structured data and relationships. Consequently, graph representation learning, which aims to automatically learn low-dimensional representations of graphs, has drawn a lot of attention in recent years. The overwhelming majority of existing methods handle unsigned graphs. However, signed graphs appear in an increasing number of application domains to model systems involving two types of opposed relationships. Several authors took an interest in signed graphs and proposed methods for providing vertex-level representations, but only one exists for whole-graph representations, and it can handle only fully connected graphs. In this article, we tackle this issue by proposing two approaches to learning whole-graph representations of general signed graphs. The first is a SG2V, a signed generalization of the whole-graph embedding method Graph2vec that relies on a modification of the Weisfeiler--Lehman relabelling procedure. The second one is WSGCN, a whole-graph generalization of the signed vertex embedding method SGCN that relies on the introduction of master nodes into the GCN. We propose several variants of both these approaches. A bottleneck in the development of whole-graph-oriented methods is the lack of data. We constitute a benchmark composed of three collections of signed graphs with corresponding ground truths. We assess our methods on this benchmark, and our results show that the signed whole-graph methods learn better representations for this task. Overall, the baseline obtains an F-measure score of 58.57, when SG2V and WSGCN reach 73.01 and 81.20, respectively. Our source code and benchmark dataset are both publicly available online.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

20 of 60 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  4. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 678
  5. 2016Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Graphscited by 314
  6. 2021Graph Self-Supervised Learning: A Surveycited by 289
  7. 2017graph2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Graphscited by 230
  8. 2019A Survey on Graph Kernelscited by 148
  9. 2020Scalable Graph Neural Networks via Bidirectional Propagationcited by 87
  10. 2019Signed Graph Attention Networkscited by 62
  11. 2017Graph Classification via Deep Learning with Virtual Nodescited by 30
  12. 2021Permutation-Invariant Variational Autoencoder for Graph-Level Representation Learningcited by 23
8 more
  1. 2017SNE: Signed Network Embeddingcited by 20
  2. 2018Signed Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 10
  3. 2019Deep Network Embedding for Graph Representation Learning in Signed Networkscited by 9
  4. 2022Contrastive Brain Network Learning via Hierarchical Signed Graph Pooling Modelcited by 8
  5. 2020AEGCN: An Autoencoder-Constrained Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 5
  6. 2019Conversational Networks for Automatic Online Moderationcited by 3
  7. 2018Multiple Partitioning of Multiplex Signed Networks: Application to European Parliament Votescited by 2
  8. 2020Multiplicity and Diversity: Analyzing the Optimal Solution Space of the Correlation Clustering Problem on Complete Signed Graphscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.