Signed Graph Convolutional Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the fact much of today's data can be represented as graphs, there has been a demand for generalizing neural network models for graph data. One recent direction that has shown fruitful results, and therefore growing interest, is the usage of graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs). They have been shown to provide a significant improvement on a wide range of tasks in network analysis, one of which being node representation learning. The task of learning low-dimensional node representations has shown to increase performance on a plethora of other tasks from link prediction and node classification, to community detection and visualization. Simultaneously, signed networks (or graphs having both positive and negative links) have become ubiquitous with the growing popularity of social media. However, since previous GCN models have primarily focused on unsigned networks (or graphs consisting of only positive links), it is unclear how they could be applied to signed networks due to the challenges presented by negative links. The primary challenges are based on negative links having not only a different semantic meaning as compared to positive links, but their principles are inherently different and they form complex relations with positive links. Therefore we propose a dedicated and principled effort that utilizes balance theory to correctly aggregate and propagate the information across layers of a signed GCN model. We perform empirical experiments comparing our proposed signed GCN against state-of-the-art baselines for learning node representations in signed networks. More specifically, our experiments are performed on four real-world datasets for the classical link sign prediction problem that is commonly used as the benchmark for signed network embeddings algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Space-Time-Separable Graph Convolutional Network for Pose Forecastingcited by 84
- 2021wsGAT: Weighted and Signed Graph Attention Networks for Link Predictioncited by 8
- 2022Graph similarity learning for change-point detection in dynamic networkscited by 4
- 2024Signed Graph Autoencoder for Explainable and Polarization-Aware Network Embeddingscited by 4
- 2024Whole-Graph Representation Learning For the Classification of Signed Networkscited by 1
- 2023Substituting Data Annotation with Balanced Updates and Collective Loss in Multi-label Text Classificationcited by 0
- 2024STEntConv: Predicting Disagreement with Stance Detection and a Signed Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 0
- 2025KAN KAN Buff Signed Graph Neural Networks?cited by 0
- 2025Belief Is All You Need: Modeling Narrative Archetypes in Conspiratorial Discoursecited by 0
- 2026Fast and Featureless Node Representation Learning with Partial Pairwise Supervisioncited by 0
- 2026Fast and Featureless Node Representation Learning with Partial Pairwise Supervision19 May 2026
- 2025Belief Is All You Need: Modeling Narrative Archetypes in Conspiratorial Discourse10 Dec 2025
- 2025KAN KAN Buff Signed Graph Neural Networks?1 Jan 2025
- 2024Whole-Graph Representation Learning For the Classification of Signed Networks30 Sep 2024
- 2024Signed Graph Autoencoder for Explainable and Polarization-Aware Network Embeddings16 Sep 2024
- 2024STEntConv: Predicting Disagreement with Stance Detection and a Signed Graph Convolutional Network23 Mar 2024
- 2023Substituting Data Annotation with Balanced Updates and Collective Loss in Multi-label Text Classification24 Sep 2023
- 2022Graph similarity learning for change-point detection in dynamic networks29 Mar 2022
- 2021Space-Time-Separable Graph Convolutional Network for Pose Forecasting9 Oct 2021
- 2021wsGAT: Weighted and Signed Graph Attention Networks for Link Prediction21 Sep 2021