mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic Policy Fusion for User Alignment Without Re-Interaction

arXiv 2409.20016 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) policies, although optimal in terms of task rewards, may not align with the personal preferences of human users. To ensure this alignment, a naive solution would be to retrain the agent using a reward function that encodes the user's specific preferences. However, such a reward function is typically not readily available, and as such, retraining the agent from scratch can be prohibitively expensive. We propose a more practical approach - to adapt the already trained policy to user-specific needs with the help of human feedback. To this end, we infer the user's intent through trajectory-level feedback and combine it with the trained task policy via a theoretically grounded dynamic policy fusion approach. As our approach collects human feedback on the very same trajectories used to learn the task policy, it does not require any additional interactions with the environment, making it a zero-shot approach. We empirically demonstrate in a number of environments that our proposed dynamic policy fusion approach consistently achieves the intended task while simultaneously adhering to user-specific needs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 14

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  3. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  4. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 308
  5. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  6. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  7. 2018RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewardscited by 162
  8. 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 155
  9. 2018Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 115
  10. 2018Composable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulationcited by 70
  11. 2020Align-RUDDER: Learning From Few Demonstrations by Reward Redistributioncited by 35
  12. 2016Personalizing a Dialogue System with Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
2 more
  1. 2023Interpretable Reward Redistribution in Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Approachcited by 17
  2. 2021Policy Fusion for Adaptive and Customizable Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment
  2. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  3. 2024Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
  4. 2023Improving Generalization of Alignment with Human Preferences through Group Invariant Learning
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  6. 2024It Takes Two: On the Seamlessness between Reward and Policy Model in RLHF
  7. 2026CoRe: Combined Rewards with Vision-Language Model Feedback for Preference-Aligned Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026World Model-Guided Reinforcement Learning via Counterfactual User Engagement Simulation