mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

IDGen: Item Discrimination Induced Prompt Generation for LLM Evaluation

arXiv 2409.18892 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow increasingly adept at managing complex tasks, the evaluation set must keep pace with these advancements to ensure it remains sufficiently discriminative. Item Discrimination (ID) theory, which is widely used in educational assessment, measures the ability of individual test items to differentiate between high and low performers. Inspired by this theory, we propose an ID-induced prompt synthesis framework for evaluating LLMs to ensure the evaluation set can continually update and refine according to model abilities. Our data synthesis framework prioritizes both breadth and specificity. It can generate prompts that comprehensively evaluate the capabilities of LLMs while revealing meaningful performance differences between models, allowing for effective discrimination of their relative strengths and weaknesses across various tasks and domains. To produce high-quality data, we incorporate a self-correct mechanism into our generalization framework, and develop two models to predict prompt discrimination and difficulty score to facilitate our data synthesis framework, contributing valuable tools to evaluation data synthesis research. We apply our generated data to evaluate five SOTA models. Our data achieves an average score of 51.92, accompanied by a variance of 10.06. By contrast, previous works (i.e., SELF-INSTRUCT and WizardLM) obtain an average score exceeding 67, with a variance below 3.2. The results demonstrate that the data generated by our framework is more challenging and discriminative compared to previous works. We will release a dataset of over 3,000 carefully crafted prompts to facilitate evaluation research of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2024.

Builds on

13 of 24 references.

References · 13

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  6. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  7. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  8. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  9. 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 728
  10. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  11. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
  12. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
1 more
  1. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Learning Compact Representations of LLM Abilities via Item Response Theory
  2. 2025Empirical Prompt Engineering for Construct Identification with Large Language Models
  3. 2025Multi-Sample Prompting and Actor-Critic Prompt Optimization for Diverse Synthetic Data Generation
  4. 2026Lower-Resource, Higher Scores: Language Bias in LLM Evaluators
  5. 2025Evaluating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge
  6. 2024LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do
  7. 2025Triangulating LLM Progress through Benchmarks, Games, and Cognitive Tests
  8. 2024Direct-Inverse Prompting: Analyzing LLMs' Discriminative Capacity in Self-Improving Generation