mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine Learning-based vs Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series for Spacecraft Attitude Sensors

arXiv 2409.17841 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the framework of Failure Detection, Isolation and Recovery (FDIR) on spacecraft, new AI-based approaches are emerging in the state of the art to overcome the limitations commonly imposed by traditional threshold checking. The present research aims at characterizing two different approaches to the problem of stuck values detection in multivariate time series coming from spacecraft attitude sensors. The analysis reveals the performance differences in the two approaches, while commenting on their interpretability and generalization to different scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

Builds on

5 of 13 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 410
  3. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
  4. 2016Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 99
  5. 2020Anomaly Detection in Univariate Time-series: A Survey on the State-of-the-Artcited by 56

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.