On Extending Direct Preference Optimization to Accommodate Ties
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
We derive and investigate two DPO variants that explicitly model the possibility of declaring a tie in pair-wise comparisons. We replace the Bradley-Terry model in DPO with two well-known modeling extensions, by Rao and Kupper and by Davidson, that assign probability to ties as alternatives to clear preferences. Our experiments in neural machine translation and summarization show that explicitly labeled ties can be added to the datasets for these DPO variants without the degradation in task performance that is observed when the same tied pairs are presented to DPO. We find empirically that the inclusion of ties leads to stronger regularization with respect to the reference policy as measured by KL divergence, and we see this even for DPO in its original form. We provide a theoretical explanation for this regularization effect using ideal DPO policy theory. We further show performance improvements over DPO in translation and mathematical reasoning using our DPO variants. We find it can be beneficial to include ties in preference optimization rather than simply discard them, as is done in common practice.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.
Builds on
19 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankings29 May
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset16 Feb
- 2024Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment8 Feb
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization for Neural Machine Translation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding14 Nov
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
Other references · 10
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
- 2024Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learningcited by 66
- 2024Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 26
- 2023A density estimation perspective on learning from pairwise human preferencescited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 36
- 2026CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 14
- 2024Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback: Wisdom of the Crowdcited by 11
- 2025From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLPcited by 3
- 2025Learning Guarantee of Reward Modeling Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025DPO Unchained: Your Training Algorithm is Secretly Disentangled in Human Choice Theory (and its Loss' Convexity is Dispensable)cited by 0
- 2026Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distributioncited by 0
- 2026Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training9 Sep 2026
- 2026Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distribution5 Feb 2026
- 2026CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding5 Jan 2026
- 2025From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLP9 Oct 2025
- 2025DPO Unchained: Your Training Algorithm is Secretly Disentangled in Human Choice Theory (and its Loss' Convexity is Dispensable)10 Jul 2025
- 2025Learning Guarantee of Reward Modeling Using Deep Neural Networks10 May 2025
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization12 Mar 2025
- 2024Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback: Wisdom of the Crowd19 Nov 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspective
- 2026Mitigating Mismatch within Reference-based Preference Optimization
- 2025BPO: Revisiting Preference Modeling in Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025C2-DPO: Constrained Controlled Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025What Matters in Data for DPO?
- 2026Disentangling Optimization Scale from Preference Scale in DPO
- 2026Autoregressive Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization