mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A novel open-source ultrasound dataset with deep learning benchmarks for spinal cord injury localization and anatomical segmentation

arXiv 2409.16441 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2024eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While deep learning has catalyzed breakthroughs across numerous domains, its broader adoption in clinical settings is inhibited by the costly and time-intensive nature of data acquisition and annotation. To further facilitate medical machine learning, we present an ultrasound dataset of 10,223 Brightness-mode (B-mode) images consisting of sagittal slices of porcine spinal cords (N=25) before and after a contusion injury. We additionally benchmark the performance metrics of several state-of-the-art object detection algorithms to localize the site of injury and semantic segmentation models to label the anatomy for comparison and creation of task-specific architectures. Finally, we evaluate the zero-shot generalization capabilities of the segmentation models on human ultrasound spinal cord images to determine whether training on our porcine dataset is sufficient for accurately interpreting human data. Our results show that the YOLOv8 detection model outperforms all evaluated models for injury localization, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP50-95) score of 0.606. Segmentation metrics indicate that the DeepLabv3 segmentation model achieves the highest accuracy on unseen porcine anatomy, with a Mean Dice score of 0.587, while SAMed achieves the highest Mean Dice score generalizing to human anatomy (0.445). To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest annotated dataset of spinal cord ultrasound images made publicly available to researchers and medical professionals, as well as the first public report of object detection and segmentation architectures to assess anatomical markers in the spinal cord for methodology development and clinical applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

Builds on

20 of 83 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  4. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  5. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  6. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  7. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  8. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  9. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  10. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  11. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  12. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
8 more
  1. 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
  2. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  3. 2023Customized Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 277
  4. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 258
  5. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
  6. 2021CTSpine1K: A Large-Scale Dataset for Spinal Vertebrae Segmentation in Computed Tomographycited by 45
  7. 2021Rethinking Ultrasound Augmentation: A Physics-Inspired Approachcited by 15
  8. 2023Deblurring Masked Autoencoder is Better Recipe for Ultrasound Image Recognitioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.