mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Redundant Is the Transformer Stack in Speech Representation Models?

arXiv 2409.16302 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2024eess.AS cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised speech representation models, particularly those leveraging transformer architectures, have demonstrated remarkable performance across various tasks such as speech recognition, speaker identification, and emotion detection. Recent studies on transformer models revealed a high redundancy between layers and the potential for significant pruning, which we will investigate here for transformer-based speech representation models. We perform a detailed analysis of layer similarity in speech representation models using three similarity metrics: cosine similarity, centered kernel alignment, and mutual nearest-neighbor alignment. Our findings reveal a block-like structure of high similarity, suggesting two main processing steps and significant redundancy of layers. We demonstrate the effectiveness of pruning transformer-based speech representation models without the need for post-training, achieving up to 40% reduction in transformer layers while maintaining over 95% of the model's predictive capacity. Furthermore, we employ a knowledge distillation method to substitute the entire transformer stack with mimicking layers, reducing the network size 95-98% and the inference time by up to 94%. This substantial decrease in computational load occurs without considerable performance loss, suggesting that the transformer stack is almost completely redundant for downstream applications of speech representation models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.

Builds on

23 of 25 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  4. 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,657
  5. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 752
  6. 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
  7. 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
  8. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  9. 2024The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of the Deeper Layerscited by 226
  10. 2021BENDR: using transformers and a contrastive self-supervised learning task to learn from massive amounts of EEG datacited by 199
  11. 2020TERA: Self-Supervised Learning of Transformer Encoder Representation for Speechcited by 188
  12. 2022Comparative layer-wise analysis of self-supervised speech modelscited by 158
11 more
  1. 2024LaCo: Large Language Model Pruning via Layer Collapsecited by 126
  2. 2020On the Effect of Dropping Layers of Pre-trained Transformer Modelscited by 118
  3. 2023DPHuBERT: Joint Distillation and Pruning of Self-Supervised Speech Modelscited by 36
  4. 2023Structured Pruning of Self-Supervised Pre-trained Models for Speech Recognition and Understandingcited by 31
  5. 2020On the Usefulness of Self-Attention for Automatic Speech Recognition with Transformerscited by 24
  6. 2024Your Transformer is Secretly Linearcited by 23
  7. 2021Layer-wise Model Pruning based on Mutual Informationcited by 19
  8. 2021Knowledge Distillation for Neural Transducers from Large Self-Supervised Pre-trained Modelscited by 15
  9. 2023Ensemble knowledge distillation of self-supervised speech modelscited by 12
  10. 2024SKILL: Similarity-aware Knowledge distILLation for Speech Self-Supervised Learningcited by 5
  11. 2024Convexity-based Pruning of Speech Representation Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Layer Reduction: Accelerating Conformer-Based Self-Supervised Model via Layer Consistency
  2. 2022Is Smaller Always Faster? Tradeoffs in Compressing Self-Supervised Speech Transformers
  3. 2021Greedy-layer Pruning: Speeding up Transformer Models for Natural Language Processing
  4. 2023Accurate and Structured Pruning for Efficient Automatic Speech Recognition
  5. 2024Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similarity
  6. 2025Hybrid Pruning: In-Situ Compression of Self-Supervised Speech Models for Speaker Verification and Anti-Spoofing
  7. 2022Ultra Fast Speech Separation Model with Teacher Student Learning
  8. 2024FinerCut: Finer-grained Interpretable Layer Pruning for Large Language Models