Konstruktor: A Strong Baseline for Simple Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While being one of the most popular question types, simple questions such as "Who is the author of Cinderella?", are still not completely solved. Surprisingly, even the most powerful modern Large Language Models are prone to errors when dealing with such questions, especially when dealing with rare entities. At the same time, as an answer may be one hop away from the question entity, one can try to develop a method that uses structured knowledge graphs (KGs) to answer such questions. In this paper, we introduce Konstruktor - an efficient and robust approach that breaks down the problem into three steps: (i) entity extraction and entity linking, (ii) relation prediction, and (iii) querying the knowledge graph. Our approach integrates language models and knowledge graphs, exploiting the power of the former and the interpretability of the latter. We experiment with two named entity recognition and entity linking methods and several relation detection techniques. We show that for relation detection, the most challenging step of the workflow, a combination of relation classification/generation and ranking outperforms other methods. We report Konstruktor's strong results on four datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.
Builds on
26 of 41 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 663
- 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 333
- 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 244
- 2023Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?cited by 167
- 2015Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networkscited by 127
- 2021Larger-Scale Transformers for Multilingual Masked Language Modelingcited by 86
- 2022Mintaka: A Complex, Natural, and Multilingual Dataset for End-to-End Question Answeringcited by 71
14 more
- 2021Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class Distributioncited by 34
- 2019Falcon 2.0: An Entity and Relation Linking Tool over Wikidatacited by 21
- 2018EARL: Joint Entity and Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphscited by 20
- 2023An Empirical Study of Pre-trained Language Models in Simple Knowledge Graph Question Answeringcited by 19
- 2018SimpleQuestions Nearly Solved: A New Upperbound and Baseline Approachcited by 18
- 2018Towards a Question Answering System over the Semantic Webcited by 14
- 2020RuBQ: A Russian Dataset for Question Answering over Wikidatacited by 14
- 2021Generative Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Basescited by 14
- 2022Knowledge Graph Question Answering Leaderboard: A Community Resource to Prevent a Replication Crisiscited by 14
- 2017Strong Baselines for Simple Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs with and without Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2020Pretrained Transformers for Simple Question Answering over Knowledge Graphscited by 12
- 2023Multilingual End to End Entity Linkingcited by 8
- 2020Leveraging Semantic Parsing for Relation Linking over Knowledge Basescited by 6
- 2021Semantic Answer Type and Relation Prediction Task (SMART 2021)cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.