mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

XTRUST: On the Multilingual Trustworthiness of Large Language Models

arXiv 2409.15762 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, capturing the attention of both practitioners and the broader public. A key question that now preoccupies the AI community concerns the capabilities and limitations of these models, with trustworthiness emerging as a central issue, particularly as LLMs are increasingly applied in sensitive fields like healthcare and finance, where errors can have serious consequences. However, most previous studies on the trustworthiness of LLMs have been limited to a single language, typically the predominant one in the dataset, such as English. In response to the growing global deployment of LLMs, we introduce XTRUST, the first comprehensive multilingual trustworthiness benchmark. XTRUST encompasses a diverse range of topics, including illegal activities, hallucination, out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness, physical and mental health, toxicity, fairness, misinformation, privacy, and machine ethics, across 10 different languages. Using XTRUST, we conduct an empirical evaluation of the multilingual trustworthiness of five widely used LLMs, offering an in-depth analysis of their performance across languages and tasks. Our results indicate that many LLMs struggle with certain low-resource languages, such as Arabic and Russian, highlighting the considerable room for improvement in the multilingual trustworthiness of current language models. The code is available at https://github.com/LluckyYH/XTRUST.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  4. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  5. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
  6. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  7. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
  8. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  9. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
  10. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  11. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  12. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 308
10 more
  1. 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 291
  2. 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
  3. 2020XGLUE: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-lingual Pre-training, Understanding and Generationcited by 221
  4. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 176
  5. 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 168
  6. 2021XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluationcited by 167
  7. 2020IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understandingcited by 108
  8. 2023EcoAssistant: Using LLM Assistant More Affordably and Accuratelycited by 47
  9. 2022SafeText: A Benchmark for Exploring Physical Safety in Language Modelscited by 41
  10. 2023How Trustworthy are Open-Source LLMs? An Assessment under Malicious Demonstrations Shows their Vulnerabilitiescited by 33

Built on by

Not cited yet.