mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Federated Domain Generalization: Understanding the Role of Advanced Pre-Trained Architectures

arXiv 2409.13527 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we explore the efficacy of advanced pre-trained architectures, such as Vision Transformers (ViT), ConvNeXt, and Swin Transformers in enhancing Federated Domain Generalization. These architectures capture global contextual features and model long-range dependencies, making them promising candidates for improving cross-domain generalization. We conduct a broad study with in-depth analysis and systematically evaluate different variants of these architectures, using extensive pre-training datasets such as ImageNet-1K, ImageNet-21K, JFT-300M, and ImageNet-22K. Additionally, we compare self-supervised and supervised pre-training strategies to assess their impact on FDG performance. Our findings suggest that self-supervised techniques, which focus on reconstructing masked image patches, can better capture the intrinsic structure of images, thereby outperforming their supervised counterparts. Comprehensive evaluations on the Office-Home and PACS datasets demonstrate that adopting advanced architectures pre-trained on larger datasets establishes new benchmarks, achieving average accuracies of 84.46% and 92.55%, respectively. Additionally, we observe that certain variants of these advanced models, despite having fewer parameters, outperform larger ResNet models. This highlights the critical role of utilizing sophisticated architectures and diverse pre-training strategies to enhance FDG performance, especially in scenarios with limited computational resources where model efficiency is crucial. Our results indicate that federated learning systems can become more adaptable and efficient by leveraging these advanced methods, offering valuable insights for future research in FDG.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2024.

Builds on

56 of 73 references.

References · 56

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  9. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  10. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  11. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  12. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
38 more
  1. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  2. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  3. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  4. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  6. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  7. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  8. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  9. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  11. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  12. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  13. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  14. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  15. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  16. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 760
  17. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 665
  18. 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 622
  19. 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 563
  20. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  21. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  22. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
  23. 2018Two at Once: Enhancing Learning and Generalization Capacities via IBN-Netcited by 361
  24. 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 353
  25. 2019FedPAQ: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Method with Periodic Averaging and Quantizationcited by 349
  26. 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 307
  27. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  28. 2021FedDG: Federated Domain Generalization on Medical Image Segmentation via Episodic Learning in Continuous Frequency Spacecited by 284
  29. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  30. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  31. 2019Learning to Optimize Domain Specific Normalization for Domain Generalizationcited by 160
  32. 2021Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learningcited by 114
  33. 2022A Broad Study of Pre-training for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 64
  34. 2021What Do We Mean by Generalization in Federated Learning?cited by 62
  35. 2023Segment anything, from space?cited by 42
  36. 2022Federated Domain Generalization for Image Recognition via Cross-Client Style Transfercited by 40
  37. 2022Faster Adaptive Federated Learningcited by 35
  38. 2023Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Radiation Oncologycited by 24

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.