State space models, emergence, and ergodicity: How many parameters are needed for stable predictions?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How many parameters are required for a model to execute a given task? It has been argued that large language models, pre-trained via self-supervised learning, exhibit emergent capabilities such as multi-step reasoning as their number of parameters reach a critical scale. In the present work, we explore whether this phenomenon can analogously be replicated in a simple theoretical model. We show that the problem of learning linear dynamical systems -- a simple instance of self-supervised learning -- exhibits a corresponding phase transition. Namely, for every non-ergodic linear system there exists a critical threshold such that a learner using fewer parameters than said threshold cannot achieve bounded error for large sequence lengths. Put differently, in our model we find that tasks exhibiting substantial long-range correlation require a certain critical number of parameters -- a phenomenon akin to emergence. We also investigate the role of the learner's parametrization and consider a simple version of a linear dynamical system with hidden state -- an imperfectly observed random walk in ℝ. For this situation, we show that there exists no learner using a linear filter which can succesfully learn the random walk unless the filter length exceeds a certain threshold depending on the effective memory length and horizon of the problem.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2024.
Builds on
13 of 15 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 137
- 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 114
- 2023A Theory for Emergence of Complex Skills in Language Modelscited by 111
- 2019Finite Sample Analysis of Stochastic System Identificationcited by 67
- 2024From Self-Attention to Markov Models: Unveiling the Dynamics of Generative Transformerscited by 34
- 2023Taming AI Bots: Controllability of Neural States in Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2023Can a Transformer Represent a Kalman Filter?cited by 20
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance
- 2025Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2026Towards Physical Intuitions for Alignment Dynamics: A Case Study With Randomness Crystallization
- 2025Detailed balance in large language model-driven agents
- 2025A Statistical Physics of Language Model Reasoning
- 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesis
- 2025Geometric Dynamics of Agentic Loops in Large Language Models
- 2025Learning-at-Criticality in Large Language Models for Quantum Field Theory and Beyond