mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

State space models, emergence, and ergodicity: How many parameters are needed for stable predictions?

arXiv 2409.13421 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How many parameters are required for a model to execute a given task? It has been argued that large language models, pre-trained via self-supervised learning, exhibit emergent capabilities such as multi-step reasoning as their number of parameters reach a critical scale. In the present work, we explore whether this phenomenon can analogously be replicated in a simple theoretical model. We show that the problem of learning linear dynamical systems -- a simple instance of self-supervised learning -- exhibits a corresponding phase transition. Namely, for every non-ergodic linear system there exists a critical threshold such that a learner using fewer parameters than said threshold cannot achieve bounded error for large sequence lengths. Put differently, in our model we find that tasks exhibiting substantial long-range correlation require a certain critical number of parameters -- a phenomenon akin to emergence. We also investigate the role of the learner's parametrization and consider a simple version of a linear dynamical system with hidden state -- an imperfectly observed random walk in ℝ. For this situation, we show that there exists no learner using a linear filter which can succesfully learn the random walk unless the filter length exceeds a certain threshold depending on the effective memory length and horizon of the problem.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2024.

Builds on

13 of 15 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
  5. 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
  6. 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 137
  7. 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 114
  8. 2023A Theory for Emergence of Complex Skills in Language Modelscited by 111
  9. 2019Finite Sample Analysis of Stochastic System Identificationcited by 67
  10. 2024From Self-Attention to Markov Models: Unveiling the Dynamics of Generative Transformerscited by 34
  11. 2023Taming AI Bots: Controllability of Neural States in Large Language Modelscited by 22
  12. 2023Can a Transformer Represent a Kalman Filter?cited by 20
1 more
  1. 2024State Space Models as Foundation Models: A Control Theoretic Overviewcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance
  2. 2025Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey
  3. 2026Towards Physical Intuitions for Alignment Dynamics: A Case Study With Randomness Crystallization
  4. 2025Detailed balance in large language model-driven agents
  5. 2025A Statistical Physics of Language Model Reasoning
  6. 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesis
  7. 2025Geometric Dynamics of Agentic Loops in Large Language Models
  8. 2025Learning-at-Criticality in Large Language Models for Quantum Field Theory and Beyond