mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Model-in-the-Loop (MILO): Accelerating Multimodal AI Data Annotation with LLMs

arXiv 2409.10702 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2024cs.HC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing demand for AI training data has transformed data annotation into a global industry, but traditional approaches relying on human annotators are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inconsistent quality. We propose the Model-in-the-Loop (MILO) framework, which integrates AI/ML models into the annotation process. Our research introduces a collaborative paradigm that leverages the strengths of both professional human annotators and large language models (LLMs). By employing LLMs as pre-annotation and real-time assistants, and judges on annotator responses, MILO enables effective interaction patterns between human annotators and LLMs. Three empirical studies on multimodal data annotation demonstrate MILO's efficacy in reducing handling time, improving data quality, and enhancing annotator experiences. We also introduce quality rubrics for flexible evaluation and fine-grained feedback on open-ended annotations. The MILO framework has implications for accelerating AI/ML development, reducing reliance on human annotation alone, and promoting better alignment between human and machine values.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.

Builds on

35 of 47 references.

References · 35

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  10. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  11. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  12. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
23 more
  1. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  2. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 372
  3. 2023Emu: Enhancing Image Generation Models Using Photogenic Needles in a Haystackcited by 278
  4. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
  5. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 202
  6. 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 197
  7. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
  8. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 138
  9. 2023CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotationcited by 93
  10. 2018Weakly-Supervised Neural Text Classificationcited by 66
  11. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  12. 2024Design Principles for Generative AI Applicationscited by 57
  13. 2024MEGAnno+: A Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation Systemcited by 47
  14. 2023ChatGPT: Beginning of an End of Manual Linguistic Data Annotation? Use Case of Automatic Genre Identificationcited by 45
  15. 2024Can Unconfident LLM Annotations Be Used for Confident Conclusions?cited by 44
  16. 2024If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4cited by 38
  17. 2022Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotationcited by 24
  18. 2021Increasing the Speed and Accuracy of Data LabelingThrough an AI Assisted Interfacecited by 21
  19. 2022CROWDLAB: Supervised learning to infer consensus labels and quality scores for data with multiple annotatorscited by 16
  20. 2021Creating Training Sets via Weak Indirect Supervisioncited by 14
  21. 2023Leveraging Large Language Models and Weak Supervision for Social Media data annotation: an evaluation using COVID-19 self-reported vaccination tweetscited by 8
  22. 2024Discipline and Label: A WEIRD Genealogy and Social Theory of Data Annotationcited by 8
  23. 2022Super-Prompting: Utilizing Model-Independent Contextual Data to Reduce Data Annotation Required in Visual Commonsense Taskscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.