mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Anomaly Detection via Generating Diversified and Hard-to-distinguish Synthetic Anomalies

arXiv 2409.10069 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised anomaly detection is a daunting task, as it relies solely on normality patterns from the training data to identify unseen anomalies during testing. Recent approaches have focused on leveraging domain-specific transformations or perturbations to generate synthetic anomalies from normal samples. The objective here is to acquire insights into normality patterns by learning to differentiate between normal samples and these crafted anomalies. However, these approaches often encounter limitations when domain-specific transformations are not well-specified such as in tabular data, or when it becomes trivial to distinguish between them. To address these issues, we introduce a novel domain-agnostic method that employs a set of conditional perturbators and a discriminator. The perturbators are trained to generate input-dependent perturbations, which are subsequently utilized to construct synthetic anomalies, and the discriminator is trained to distinguish normal samples from them. We ensure that the generated anomalies are both diverse and hard to distinguish through two key strategies: i) directing perturbations to be orthogonal to each other and ii) constraining perturbations to remain in proximity to normal samples. Throughout experiments on real-world datasets, we demonstrate the superiority of our method over state-of-the-art benchmarks, which is evident not only in image data but also in tabular data, where domain-specific transformation is not readily accessible. Additionally, we empirically confirm the adaptability of our method to semi-supervised settings, demonstrating its capacity to incorporate supervised signals to enhance anomaly detection performance even further.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  4. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  5. 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
  6. 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 510
  7. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  8. 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
  9. 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
  10. 2020Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classificationcited by 133
  11. 2020DROCC: Deep Robust One-Class Classificationcited by 121
  12. 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 98
2 more
  1. 2022Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 90
  2. 2020Viewmaker Networks: Learning Views for Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.