mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Module-wise Adaptive Adversarial Training for End-to-end Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2409.07321 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in deep learning have markedly improved autonomous driving (AD) models, particularly end-to-end systems that integrate perception, prediction, and planning stages, achieving state-of-the-art performance. However, these models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where human-imperceptible perturbations can disrupt decision-making processes. While adversarial training is an effective method for enhancing model robustness against such attacks, no prior studies have focused on its application to end-to-end AD models. In this paper, we take the first step in adversarial training for end-to-end AD models and present a novel Module-wise Adaptive Adversarial Training (MA2T). However, extending conventional adversarial training to this context is highly non-trivial, as different stages within the model have distinct objectives and are strongly interconnected. To address these challenges, MA2T first introduces Module-wise Noise Injection, which injects noise before the input of different modules, targeting training models with the guidance of overall objectives rather than each independent module loss. Additionally, we introduce Dynamic Weight Accumulation Adaptation, which incorporates accumulated weight changes to adaptively learn and adjust the loss weights of each module based on their contributions (accumulated reduction rates) for better balance and robust training. To demonstrate the efficacy of our defense, we conduct extensive experiments on the widely-used nuScenes dataset across several end-to-end AD models under both white-box and black-box attacks, where our method outperforms other baselines by large margins (+5-10%). Moreover, we validate the robustness of our defense through closed-loop evaluation in the CARLA simulation environment, showing improved resilience even against natural corruption.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 50 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2024.

Builds on

50 of 66 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Adversarial Driving: Attacking End-to-End Autonomous Driving16 Mar

Other references · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  7. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  8. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  9. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  10. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  12. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
37 more
  1. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  2. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
  3. 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 622
  4. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  5. 2022ST-P3: End-to-end Vision-based Autonomous Driving via Spatial-Temporal Feature Learningcited by 368
  6. 2018Multimodal Trajectory Predictions for Autonomous Driving using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 289
  7. 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 252
  8. 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 231
  9. 2020Fast and Furious: Real Time End-to-End 3D Detection, Tracking and Motion Forecasting with a Single Convolutional Netcited by 228
  10. 2021MP3: A Unified Model to Map, Perceive, Predict and Plancited by 212
  11. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 183
  12. 2020Perceive, Predict, and Plan: Safe Motion Planning Through Interpretable Semantic Representationscited by 153
  13. 2020PnPNet: End-to-End Perception and Prediction with Tracking in the Loopcited by 144
  14. 2022Learning from All Vehiclescited by 135
  15. 2021Dual Attention Suppression Attack: Generate Adversarial Camouflage in Physical Worldcited by 127
  16. 2019Universal Physical Camouflage Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 91
  17. 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 90
  18. 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
  19. 2020PiP: Planning-informed Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 80
  20. 2021RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training Techniquescited by 79
  21. 2019Training Robust Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Noise Propagationcited by 62
  22. 2023X-Adv: Physical Adversarial Object Attacks against X-ray Prohibited Item Detectioncited by 59
  23. 2022AdvDO: Realistic Adversarial Attacks for Trajectory Predictioncited by 49
  24. 2021A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustnesscited by 42
  25. 2021Harnessing Perceptual Adversarial Patches for Crowd Countingcited by 39
  26. 2023Among Us: Adversarially Robust Collaborative Perception by Consensuscited by 37
  27. 2024Towards Robust Physical-world Backdoor Attacks on Lane Detectioncited by 26
  28. 2017Regularizing deep networks using efficient layerwise adversarial trainingcited by 24
  29. 2022Exploring the Relationship between Architecture and Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 23
  30. 2022A Comprehensive Study of the Robustness for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectors against Adversarial Attackscited by 22
  31. 2023Towards Benchmarking and Assessing Visual Naturalness of Physical World Adversarial Attackscited by 18
  32. 2024LanEvil: Benchmarking the Robustness of Lane Detection to Environmental Illusionscited by 18
  33. 2023Dynamic Adversarial Attacks on Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 11
  34. 2020Adversarial Robustness of Deep Sensor Fusion Modelscited by 6
  35. 2023Benchmarking the Physical-world Adversarial Robustness of Vehicle Detectioncited by 6
  36. 2023Exploring the Physical World Adversarial Robustness of Vehicle Detectioncited by 5
  37. 2023AdvMono3D: Advanced Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Robust Adversarial Trainingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Attack End-to-End Autonomous Driving through Module-Wise Noise
  2. 2023CAT: Closed-loop Adversarial Training for Safe End-to-End Driving
  3. 2024AdvDiffuser: Generating Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios via Guided Diffusion
  4. 2026From Attacks to Curricula: Learnability-Guided Adversarial Training for Safe Autonomous Driving
  5. 2021Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning for Improving the Robustness of Multi-agent Autonomous Driving Policies
  6. 2026ADV-0: Closed-Loop Min-Max Adversarial Training for Long-Tail Robustness in Autonomous Driving
  7. 2026Adversarial Flow Matching for Imperceptible Attacks on End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  8. 2026UniAda: Universal Adaptive Multi-objective Adversarial Attack for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems