mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cross-Refine: Improving Natural Language Explanation Generation by Learning in Tandem

arXiv 2409.07123 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language explanations (NLEs) are vital for elucidating the reasoning behind large language model (LLM) decisions. Many techniques have been developed to generate NLEs using LLMs. However, like humans, LLMs might not always produce optimal NLEs on first attempt. Inspired by human learning processes, we introduce Cross-Refine, which employs role modeling by deploying two LLMs as generator and critic, respectively. The generator outputs a first NLE and then refines this initial explanation using feedback and suggestions provided by the critic. Cross-Refine does not require any supervised training data or additional training. We validate Cross-Refine across three NLP tasks using three state-of-the-art open-source LLMs through automatic and human evaluation. We select Self-Refine (Madaan et al., 2023) as the baseline, which only utilizes self-feedback to refine the explanations. Our findings from automatic evaluation and a user study indicate that Cross-Refine outperforms Self-Refine. Meanwhile, Cross-Refine can perform effectively with less powerful LLMs, whereas Self-Refine only yields strong results with ChatGPT. Additionally, we conduct an ablation study to assess the importance of feedback and suggestions. Both of them play an important role in refining explanations. We further evaluate Cross-Refine on a bilingual dataset in English and German.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 46 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2024.

Builds on

46 of 70 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Think Twice Before Trusting: Self-Detection for Large Language Models through Comprehensive Answer Reflection15 Mar
  2. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet3 Oct
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar
  4. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improve20 Oct

Other references · 42

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  7. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  8. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  9. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  10. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  11. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  12. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
30 more
  1. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  2. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  3. 2023LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compressioncited by 443
  4. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
  5. 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 376
  6. 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
  7. 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 271
  8. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 159
  9. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
  10. 2022Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Surveycited by 129
  11. 2023Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanationscited by 107
  12. 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Modelscited by 104
  13. 2024SaySelf: Teaching LLMs to Express Confidence with Self-Reflective Rationalescited by 102
  14. 2023Learning From Mistakes Makes LLM Better Reasonercited by 97
  15. 2024Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoningcited by 69
  16. 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 61
  17. 2023Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Modelscited by 50
  18. 2022A Comparative Study of Faithfulness Metrics for Model Interpretability Methodscited by 38
  19. 2023HealthFC: Verifying Health Claims with Evidence-Based Medical Fact-Checkingcited by 35
  20. 2021A Study of Automatic Metrics for the Evaluation of Natural Language Explanationscited by 34
  21. 2023Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationalescited by 33
  22. 2021On the Diversity and Limits of Human Explanationscited by 30
  23. 2021Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanationscited by 26
  24. 2024Leveraging LLM Reasoning Enhances Personalized Recommender Systemscited by 26
  25. 2024ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality Like Humans: But on Which Scales?cited by 17
  26. 2024LLMCheckup: Conversational Examination of Large Language Models via Interpretability Tools and Self-Explanationscited by 16
  27. 2023InterroLang: Exploring NLP Models and Datasets through Dialogue-based Explanationscited by 11
  28. 2023Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated Introspectioncited by 7
  29. 2024CoXQL: A Dataset for Parsing Explanation Requests in Conversational XAI Systemscited by 5
  30. 2024RORA: Robust Free-Text Rationale Evaluationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RefineBench: Evaluating Refinement Capability of Language Models via Checklists
  2. 2024Teaching LLMs to Refine with Tools
  3. 2026Explanation Generation for Contradiction Reconciliation with LLMs
  4. 2026From XAI to Stories: A Factorial Study of LLM-Generated Explanation Quality
  5. 2022Training Language Models with Language Feedback
  6. 2025Refine-n-Judge: Curating High-Quality Preference Chains for LLM-Fine-Tuning
  7. 2026When Do Explanations Help In-Context Learning? A Comparative Study of Natural Language Explanation Types and Faithfulness
  8. 2022Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Better