Latent Space Interpretation for Stylistic Analysis and Explainable Authorship Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent state-of-the-art authorship attribution methods learn authorship representations of texts in a latent, non-interpretable space, hindering their usability in real-world applications. Our work proposes a novel approach to interpreting these learned embeddings by identifying representative points in the latent space and utilizing LLMs to generate informative natural language descriptions of the writing style of each point. We evaluate the alignment of our interpretable space with the latent one and find that it achieves the best prediction agreement compared to other baselines. Additionally, we conduct a human evaluation to assess the quality of these style descriptions, validating their utility as explanations for the latent space. Finally, we investigate whether human performance on the challenging AA task improves when aided by our system's explanations, finding an average improvement of around +20% in accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2024.
Builds on
14 of 32 references.
References · 14
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 361
- 2022Same Author or Just Same Topic? Towards Content-Independent Style Representationscited by 83
- 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
- 2022Prompt Consistency for Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 66
- 2023Learning Interpretable Style Embeddings via Prompting LLMscited by 29
- 2022On the State of the Art in Authorship Attribution and Authorship Verificationcited by 27
- 2023Can Authorship Representation Learning Capture Stylistic Features?cited by 17
- 2023Representation Of Lexical Stylistic Features In Language Models' Embedding Spacecited by 8
2 more
- 2019Adversarial Speaker Verificationcited by 4
- 2024Adjusting Interpretable Dimensions in Embedding Space with Human Judgmentscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Leveraging Multilingual Training for Authorship Representation: Enhancing Generalization across Languages and Domainscited by 7
- 2025Residualized Similarity for Faithfully Explainable Authorship Verificationcited by 4
- 2025What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddingscited by 0
- 2025XAM: Interactive Explainability for Authorship Attribution Modelscited by 0
- 2026Where Does Authorship Signal Emerge in Encoder-Based Language Models?cited by 0
- 2026Interpreting Style Representations via Style-Eliciting Promptscited by 0
- 2026Interpreting Style Representations via Style-Eliciting Prompts4 Jun 2026
- 2026Where Does Authorship Signal Emerge in Encoder-Based Language Models?19 May 2026
- 2025XAM: Interactive Explainability for Authorship Attribution Models7 Dec 2025
- 2025Residualized Similarity for Faithfully Explainable Authorship Verification6 Oct 2025
- 2025Leveraging Multilingual Training for Authorship Representation: Enhancing Generalization across Languages and Domains20 Sep 2025
- 2025What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddings19 May 2025