mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DetoxBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multitask Fraud & Abuse Detection

arXiv 2409.06072 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks. However, their practical application in high-stake domains, such as fraud and abuse detection, remains an area that requires further exploration. The existing applications often narrowly focus on specific tasks like toxicity or hate speech detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark suite designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and mitigating fraudulent and abusive language across various real-world scenarios. Our benchmark encompasses a diverse set of tasks, including detecting spam emails, hate speech, misogynistic language, and more. We evaluated several state-of-the-art LLMs, including models from Anthropic, Mistral AI, and the AI21 family, to provide a comprehensive assessment of their capabilities in this critical domain. The results indicate that while LLMs exhibit proficient baseline performance in individual fraud and abuse detection tasks, their performance varies considerably across tasks, particularly struggling with tasks that demand nuanced pragmatic reasoning, such as identifying diverse forms of misogynistic language. These findings have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of LLMs in high-risk applications. Our benchmark suite can serve as a tool for researchers and practitioners to systematically evaluate LLMs for multi-task fraud detection and drive the creation of more robust, trustworthy, and ethically-aligned systems for fraud and abuse detection.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  8. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  9. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  10. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  11. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  12. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
4 more
  1. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  2. 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 224
  3. 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 207
  4. 2020How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictionscited by 181

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.