Interpretable Responsibility Sharing as a Heuristic for Task and Motion Planning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article introduces a novel heuristic for Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) named Interpretable Responsibility Sharing (IRS), which enhances planning efficiency in domestic robots by leveraging human-constructed environments and inherent biases. Utilizing auxiliary objects (e.g., trays and pitchers), which are commonly found in household settings, IRS systematically incorporates these elements to simplify and optimize task execution. The heuristic is rooted in the novel concept of Responsibility Sharing (RS), where auxiliary objects share the task's responsibility with the embodied agent, dividing complex tasks into manageable sub-problems. This division not only reflects human usage patterns but also aids robots in navigating and manipulating within human spaces more effectively. By integrating Optimized Rule Synthesis (ORS) for decision-making, IRS ensures that the use of auxiliary objects is both strategic and context-aware, thereby improving the interpretability and effectiveness of robotic planning. Experiments conducted across various household tasks demonstrate that IRS significantly outperforms traditional methods by reducing the effort required in task execution and enhancing the overall decision-making process. This approach not only aligns with human intuitive methods but also offers a scalable solution adaptable to diverse domestic environments. Code is available at https://github.com/asyncs/IRS.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.
Builds on
24 of 81 references.
References · 24
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 929
- 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 893
- 2015BinaryConnect: Training Deep Neural Networks with binary weights during propagationscited by 571
- 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
- 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 253
- 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
- 2017End-to-End Differentiable Provingcited by 159
- 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
- 2019Hierarchical Foresight: Self-Supervised Learning of Long-Horizon Tasks via Visual Subgoal Generationcited by 83
- 2020Deep Affordance Foresight: Planning Through What Can Be Done in the Futurecited by 41
12 more
- 2021Scalable Rule-Based Representation Learning for Interpretable Classificationcited by 40
- 2021Long-Horizon Manipulation of Unknown Objects via Task and Motion Planning with Estimated Affordancescited by 38
- 2016FFRob: Leveraging Symbolic Planning for Efficient Task and Motion Planningcited by 34
- 2016Making Tree Ensembles Interpretable: A Bayesian Model Selection Approachcited by 27
- 2021Long-Horizon Multi-Robot Rearrangement Planning for Construction Assemblycited by 24
- 2021Efficient and Interpretable Robot Manipulation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2016Towards Blended Reactive Planning and Acting using Behavior Treescited by 20
- 2019Transparent Classification with Multilayer Logical Perceptrons and Random Binarizationcited by 16
- 2022Towards Explainable Motion Prediction using Heterogeneous Graph Representationscited by 10
- 2020Resource-rational Task Decomposition to Minimize Planning Costscited by 9
- 2021RHH-LGP: Receding Horizon And Heuristics-Based Logic-Geometric Programming For Task And Motion Planningcited by 6
- 2017Combined Task and Motion Planning as Classical AI Planningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.