mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A practical approach to evaluating the adversarial distance for machine learning classifiers

arXiv 2409.03598 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robustness is critical for machine learning (ML) classifiers to ensure consistent performance in real-world applications where models may encounter corrupted or adversarial inputs. In particular, assessing the robustness of classifiers to adversarial inputs is essential to protect systems from vulnerabilities and thus ensure safety in use. However, methods to accurately compute adversarial robustness have been challenging for complex ML models and high-dimensional data. Furthermore, evaluations typically measure adversarial accuracy on specific attack budgets, limiting the informative value of the resulting metrics. This paper investigates the estimation of the more informative adversarial distance using iterative adversarial attacks and a certification approach. Combined, the methods provide a comprehensive evaluation of adversarial robustness by computing estimates for the upper and lower bounds of the adversarial distance. We present visualisations and ablation studies that provide insights into how this evaluation method should be applied and parameterised. We find that our adversarial attack approach is effective compared to related implementations, while the certification method falls short of expectations. The approach in this paper should encourage a more informative way of evaluating the adversarial robustness of ML classifiers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2024.

Builds on

28 of 40 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  8. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  9. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  10. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  11. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  12. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
16 more
  1. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
  2. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  3. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  4. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
  5. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
  6. 2017EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examplescited by 154
  7. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  8. 2016Measuring Neural Net Robustness with Constraintscited by 90
  9. 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
  10. 2018A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 54
  11. 2021A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustnesscited by 41
  12. 2022Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspectivecited by 41
  13. 2018Gradient Masking Causes CLEVER to Overestimate Adversarial Perturbation Sizecited by 9
  14. 2018An ADMM-Based Universal Framework for Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
  15. 2021Adversarially Robust Kernel Smoothingcited by 4
  16. 2023Investigating the Corruption Robustness of Image Classifiers with Random Lp-norm Corruptionscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.