Optimization by Parallel Quasi-Quantum Annealing with Gradient-Based Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning-based methods have gained attention as general-purpose solvers due to their ability to automatically learn problem-specific heuristics, reducing the need for manually crafted heuristics. However, these methods often face scalability challenges. To address these issues, the improved Sampling algorithm for Combinatorial Optimization (iSCO), using discrete Langevin dynamics, has been proposed, demonstrating better performance than several learning-based solvers. This study proposes a different approach that integrates gradient-based update through continuous relaxation, combined with Quasi-Quantum Annealing (QQA). QQA smoothly transitions the objective function, starting from a simple convex function, minimized at half-integral values, to the original objective function, where the relaxed variables are minimized only in the discrete space. Furthermore, we incorporate parallel run communication leveraging GPUs to enhance exploration capabilities and accelerate convergence. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our method is a competitive general-purpose solver, achieving performance comparable to iSCO and learning-based solvers across various benchmark problems. Notably, our method exhibits superior speed-quality trade-offs for large-scale instances compared to iSCO, learning-based solvers, commercial solvers, and specialized algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.
Builds on
29 of 73 references.
References · 29
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
- 2017Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphscited by 557
- 2019Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 313
- 2018Learning to Perform Local Rewriting for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 183
- 2018Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Networks and Guided Tree Searchcited by 182
- 2022DIMES: A Differentiable Meta Solver for Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 127
- 2020Erdos Goes Neural: an Unsupervised Learning Framework for Combinatorial Optimization on Graphscited by 115
- 2021Combinatorial Optimization with Physics-Inspired Graph Neural Networkscited by 107
- 2020Hybrid Models for Learning to Branchcited by 95
- 2021Oops I Took A Gradient: Scalable Sampling for Discrete Distributionscited by 92
- 2020Learning What to Defer for Maximum Independent Setscited by 53
17 more
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Maximum Constraint Satisfactioncited by 46
- 2022A Langevin-like Sampler for Discrete Distributionscited by 42
- 2020Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2022What's Wrong with Deep Learning in Tree Search for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 36
- 2022Modern graph neural networks do worse than classical greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems like maximum independent setcited by 33
- 2015Finding Near-Optimal Independent Sets at Scalecited by 32
- 2022Unsupervised Learning for Combinatorial Optimization with Principled Objective Relaxationcited by 32
- 2022Graph Coloring with Physics-Inspired Graph Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2022Discrete Langevin Sampler via Wasserstein Gradient Flowcited by 23
- 2023Unsupervised Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Needs Meta-Learningcited by 19
- 2019GAP: Generalizable Approximate Graph Partitioning Frameworkcited by 18
- 2022Annealed Training for Combinatorial Optimization on Graphscited by 17
- 2023Controlling Continuous Relaxation for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 16
- 2019Monte Carlo algorithms are very effective in finding the largest independent set in sparse random graphscited by 9
- 2023Reply to: Modern graph neural networks do worse than classical greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems like maximum independent setcited by 9
- 2017Scalable Kernelization for Maximum Independent Setscited by 8
- 2024Continuous Parallel Relaxation for Finding Diverse Solutions in Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Quantization Error Propagation: Revisiting Layer-Wise Post-Training Quantizationcited by 36
- 2025More Than Bits: Multi-Envelope Double Binary Factorization for Extreme Quantizationcited by 3
- 2026Neural QAOA2: Differentiable Joint Graph Partitioning and Parameter Initialization for Quantum Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Test-Time Adaptation for Unsupervised Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Signs Beat Floats: Low-Rank Double-Binary Adaptation for On-Device Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026From Sweep to Seam: Interleaved Cross-Block Post-Training Quantizationcited by 0
- 2026From Sweep to Seam: Interleaved Cross-Block Post-Training Quantization10 Aug 2026
- 2026Signs Beat Floats: Low-Rank Double-Binary Adaptation for On-Device Fine-Tuning22 May 2026
- 2026Neural QAOA2: Differentiable Joint Graph Partitioning and Parameter Initialization for Quantum Combinatorial Optimization13 May 2026
- 2026Test-Time Adaptation for Unsupervised Combinatorial Optimization28 Jan 2026
- 2025More Than Bits: Multi-Envelope Double Binary Factorization for Extreme Quantization31 Dec 2025
- 2025Quantization Error Propagation: Revisiting Layer-Wise Post-Training Quantization13 Apr 2025