Monte Carlo algorithms are very effective in finding the largest independent set in sparse random graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The effectiveness of stochastic algorithms based on Monte Carlo dynamics in solving hard optimization problems is mostly unknown. Beyond the basic statement that at a dynamical phase transition the ergodicity breaks and a Monte Carlo dynamics cannot sample correctly the probability distribution in times linear in the system size, there are almost no predictions nor intuitions on the behavior of this class of stochastic dynamics. The situation is particularly intricate because, when using a Monte Carlo based algorithm as an optimization algorithm, one is usually interested in the out of equilibrium behavior which is very hard to analyse. Here we focus on the use of Parallel Tempering in the search for the largest independent set in a sparse random graph, showing that it can find solutions well beyond the dynamical threshold. Comparison with state-of-the-art message passing algorithms reveals that parallel tempering is definitely the algorithm performing best, although a theory explaining its behavior is still lacking.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022Modern graph neural networks do worse than classical greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems like maximum independent setcited by 33
- 2023Unsupervised Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Needs Meta-Learningcited by 20
- 2023Controlling Continuous Relaxation for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 16
- 2024Optimization by Parallel Quasi-Quantum Annealing with Gradient-Based Samplingcited by 7
- 2025Demonstrating Real Advantage of Machine-Learning-Enhanced Monte Carlo for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 5
- 2023Stochastic Gradient Descent-like relaxation is equivalent to Metropolis dynamics in discrete optimization and inference problemscited by 3
- 2026Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks in Solving Hard Constraint Satisfaction Problemscited by 2
- 2025A Geometric Perspective on the Difficulties of Learning GNN-based SAT Solverscited by 0
- 2026Improving Generalization by Permutation Routing Across Model Copiescited by 0
- 2026Improving Generalization by Permutation Routing Across Model Copies10 May 2026
- 2026Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks in Solving Hard Constraint Satisfaction Problems20 Feb 2026
- 2025Demonstrating Real Advantage of Machine-Learning-Enhanced Monte Carlo for Combinatorial Optimization22 Oct 2025
- 2025A Geometric Perspective on the Difficulties of Learning GNN-based SAT Solvers29 Aug 2025
- 2024Optimization by Parallel Quasi-Quantum Annealing with Gradient-Based Sampling2 Sep 2024
- 2023Controlling Continuous Relaxation for Combinatorial Optimization29 Sep 2023
- 2023Stochastic Gradient Descent-like relaxation is equivalent to Metropolis dynamics in discrete optimization and inference problems11 Sep 2023
- 2023Unsupervised Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Needs Meta-Learning8 Jan 2023
- 2022Modern graph neural networks do worse than classical greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems like maximum independent set27 Jun 2022