mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing CLIP Models for Image Retrieval with Maintained Joint-Embedding Alignment

arXiv 2409.01936 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive Language and Image Pairing (CLIP), a transformative method in multimedia retrieval, typically trains two neural networks concurrently to generate joint embeddings for text and image pairs. However, when applied directly, these models often struggle to differentiate between visually distinct images that have similar captions, resulting in suboptimal performance for image-based similarity searches. This paper addresses the challenge of optimizing CLIP models for various image-based similarity search scenarios, while maintaining their effectiveness in text-based search tasks such as text-to-image retrieval and zero-shot classification. We propose and evaluate two novel methods aimed at refining the retrieval capabilities of CLIP without compromising the alignment between text and image embeddings. The first method involves a sequential fine-tuning process: initially optimizing the image encoder for more precise image retrieval and subsequently realigning the text encoder to these optimized image embeddings. The second approach integrates pseudo-captions during the retrieval-optimization phase to foster direct alignment within the embedding space. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that these methods enhance CLIP's performance on various benchmarks, including image retrieval, k-NN classification, and zero-shot text-based classification, while maintaining robustness in text-to-image retrieval. Our optimized models permit maintaining a single embedding per image, significantly simplifying the infrastructure needed for large-scale multi-modal similarity search systems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.

Builds on

33 of 53 references.

References · 33

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  7. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  9. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  10. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  11. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  12. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
21 more
  1. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  2. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  3. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
  4. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  5. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  6. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 685
  7. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
  8. 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 613
  9. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  10. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
  11. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
  12. 2021Towards Open World Object Detectioncited by 297
  13. 2022GLIPv2: Unifying Localization and Vision-Language Understandingcited by 275
  14. 2022Unified Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Label Spacecited by 194
  15. 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 189
  16. 2015Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activationscited by 160
  17. 2021DOLG: Single-Stage Image Retrieval with Deep Orthogonal Fusion of Local and Global Featurescited by 54
  18. 2023Global Features are All You Need for Image Retrieval and Rerankingcited by 41
  19. 2022Efficient Vision-Language Pretraining with Visual Concepts and Hierarchical Alignmentcited by 19
  20. 2021GPR1200: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Content-Based Image Retrievalcited by 14
  21. 2023MOFI: Learning Image Representations from Noisy Entity Annotated Imagescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

6 papers.