mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PMLBmini: A Tabular Classification Benchmark Suite for Data-Scarce Applications

arXiv 2409.01635 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In practice, we are often faced with small-sized tabular data. However, current tabular benchmarks are not geared towards data-scarce applications, making it very difficult to derive meaningful conclusions from empirical comparisons. We introduce PMLBmini, a tabular benchmark suite of 44 binary classification datasets with sample sizes ≤ 500. We use our suite to thoroughly evaluate current automated machine learning (AutoML) frameworks, off-the-shelf tabular deep neural networks, as well as classical linear models in the low-data regime. Our analysis reveals that state-of-the-art AutoML and deep learning approaches often fail to appreciably outperform even a simple logistic regression baseline, but we also identify scenarios where AutoML and deep learning methods are indeed reasonable to apply. Our benchmark suite, available on https://github.com/RicardoKnauer/TabMini , allows researchers and practitioners to analyze their own methods and challenge their data efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.

Builds on

26 of 53 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
  4. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  5. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
  6. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
  7. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 368
  8. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
  9. 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
  10. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
  11. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 139
  12. 2015Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?cited by 116
14 more
  1. 2019An Open Source AutoML Benchmarkcited by 85
  2. 2018How Complex is your classification problem? A survey on measuring classification complexitycited by 66
  3. 2020PMLB v1.0: An open source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methodscited by 58
  4. 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
  5. 2015JuMP: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Optimizationcited by 49
  6. 2021GitTables: A Large-Scale Corpus of Relational Tablescited by 44
  7. 2023TabRepo: A Large Scale Repository of Tabular Model Evaluations and its AutoML Applicationscited by 32
  8. 2018AutoPrognosis: Automated Clinical Prognostic Modeling via Bayesian Optimization with Structured Kernel Learningcited by 22
  9. 2024HyperFast: Instant Classification for Tabular Datacited by 22
  10. 2023Scaling TabPFN: Sketching and Feature Selection for Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 18
  11. 2022AutoPrognosis 2.0: Democratizing Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling in Healthcare with Automated Machine Learningcited by 10
  12. 2022Safe Screening for Logistic Regression with ℓ0-ℓ2 Regularizationcited by 6
  13. 2021To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasetscited by 5
  14. 2023Cost-Sensitive Best Subset Selection for Logistic Regression: A Mixed-Integer Conic Optimization Perspectivecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.