Data and Model Dependencies of Membership Inference Attack
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to be vulnerable to Membership Inference Attacks (MIA), which infer the membership of a given data point in the target dataset by observing the prediction output of the ML model. While the key factors for the success of MIA have not yet been fully understood, existing defense mechanisms such as using L2 regularization cite10shokri2017membership and dropout layers citesalem2018ml take only the model's overfitting property into consideration. In this paper, we provide an empirical analysis of the impact of both the data and ML model properties on the vulnerability of ML techniques to MIA. Our results reveal the relationship between MIA accuracy and properties of the dataset and training model in use. In particular, we show that the size of shadow dataset, the class and feature balance and the entropy of the target dataset, the configurations and fairness of the training model are the most influential factors. Based on those experimental findings, we conclude that along with model overfitting, multiple properties jointly contribute to MIA success instead of any single property. Building on our experimental findings, we propose using those data and model properties as regularizers to protect ML models against MIA. Our results show that the proposed defense mechanisms can reduce the MIA accuracy by up to 25% without sacrificing the ML model prediction utility.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
- 2021Efficient passive membership inference attack in federated learningcited by 14
- 2024Is My Data in Your AI? Membership Inference Test (MINT) applied to Face Biometricscited by 12
- 2024Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learningcited by 6
- 2026G-Drift MIA: Membership Inference via Gradient-Induced Feature Drift in LLMscited by 6
- 2021A Review of Confidentiality Threats Against Embedded Neural Network Modelscited by 4
- 2022A Differentially Private Framework for Deep Learning with Convexified Loss Functionscited by 4
- 2024On the Impact of Uncertainty and Calibration on Likelihood-Ratio Membership Inference Attackscited by 4
- 2025Trustworthy AI Must Account for Interactionscited by 4
- 2024Assessing the Impact of Image Dataset Features on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2026G-Drift MIA: Membership Inference via Gradient-Induced Feature Drift in LLMs1 Apr 2026
- 2025Trustworthy AI Must Account for Interactions9 Apr 2025
- 2024Assessing the Impact of Image Dataset Features on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning2 Sep 2024
- 2024On the Impact of Uncertainty and Calibration on Likelihood-Ratio Membership Inference Attacks16 Feb 2024
- 2024Is My Data in Your AI? Membership Inference Test (MINT) applied to Face Biometrics14 Feb 2024
- 2024Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning7 Feb 2024
- 2022A Differentially Private Framework for Deep Learning with Convexified Loss Functions3 Apr 2022
- 2021Efficient passive membership inference attack in federated learning31 Oct 2021
- 2021A Review of Confidentiality Threats Against Embedded Neural Network Models4 May 2021
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey14 Mar 2021