LM-PUB-QUIZ: A Comprehensive Framework for Zero-Shot Evaluation of Relational Knowledge in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge probing evaluates the extent to which a language model (LM) has acquired relational knowledge during its pre-training phase. It provides a cost-effective means of comparing LMs of different sizes and training setups and is useful for monitoring knowledge gained or lost during continual learning (CL). In prior work, we presented an improved knowledge probe called BEAR (Wiland et al., 2024), which enables the comparison of LMs trained with different pre-training objectives (causal and masked LMs) and addresses issues of skewed distributions in previous probes to deliver a more unbiased reading of LM knowledge. With this paper, we present LM-PUB- QUIZ, a Python framework and leaderboard built around the BEAR probing mechanism that enables researchers and practitioners to apply it in their work. It provides options for standalone evaluation and direct integration into the widely-used training pipeline of the Hugging Face TRANSFORMERS library. Further, it provides a fine-grained analysis of different knowledge types to assist users in better understanding the knowledge in each evaluated LM. We publicly release LM-PUB-QUIZ as an open-source project.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2023Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflictscited by 333
- 2020How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictionscited by 181
- 2019On the Use of ArXiv as a Datasetcited by 101
- 2024Decoding by Contrasting Knowledge: Enhancing LLMs' Confidence on Edited Factscited by 36
- 2023OpinionGPT: Modelling Explicit Biases in Instruction-Tuned LLMscited by 29
- 2024OpenFactCheck: A Unified Framework for Factuality Evaluation of LLMscited by 28
- 2024BEAR: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Relational Knowledge in Causal and Masked Language Modelscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025What Matters in Linearizing Language Models? A Comparative Study of Architecture, Scale, and Task Adaptationcited by 1
- 2025From Data to Knowledge: Evaluating How Efficiently Language Models Learn Factscited by 1
- 2026Self-Aware Knowledge Probing: Evaluating Language Models' Relational Knowledge through Confidence Calibrationcited by 1
- 2024BabyHGRN: Exploring RNNs for Sample-Efficient Training of Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Self-Aware Knowledge Probing: Evaluating Language Models' Relational Knowledge through Confidence Calibration26 Jan 2026
- 2025From Data to Knowledge: Evaluating How Efficiently Language Models Learn Facts20 Jun 2025
- 2025What Matters in Linearizing Language Models? A Comparative Study of Architecture, Scale, and Task Adaptation19 Apr 2025
- 2024BabyHGRN: Exploring RNNs for Sample-Efficient Training of Language Models20 Dec 2024