mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Transformers Do Enumerative Geometry?

arXiv 2408.14915 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2024cs.LG math.AGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can Transformers model and learn enumerative geometry? What is a robust procedure for using Transformers in abductive knowledge discovery within a mathematician-machine collaboration? In this work, we introduce a Transformer-based approach to computational enumerative geometry, specifically targeting the computation of psi-class intersection numbers on the moduli space of curves. By reformulating the problem as a continuous optimization task, we compute intersection numbers across a wide value range from 10-45 to 1045. To capture the recursive nature inherent in these intersection numbers, we propose the Dynamic Range Activator (DRA), a new activation function that enhances the Transformer's ability to model recursive patterns and handle severe heteroscedasticity. Given precision requirements for computing the intersections, we quantify the uncertainty of the predictions using Conformal Prediction with a dynamic sliding window adaptive to the partitions of equivalent number of marked points. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no prior work on modeling recursive functions with such a high-variance and factorial growth. Beyond simply computing intersection numbers, we explore the enumerative "world-model" of Transformers. Our interpretability analysis reveals that the network is implicitly modeling the Virasoro constraints in a purely data-driven manner. Moreover, through abductive hypothesis testing, probing, and causal inference, we uncover evidence of an emergent internal representation of the the large-genus asymptotic of psi-class intersection numbers. These findings suggest that the network internalizes the parameters of the asymptotic closed-form and the polynomiality phenomenon of intersection numbers in a non-linear manner. This opens up new possibilities in inferring asymptotic closed-form expressions directly from limited amount of data.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.

Builds on

56 of 97 references.

References · 56

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  6. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  7. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  8. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  9. 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 688
  10. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  11. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  12. 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 477
38 more
  1. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  2. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
  3. 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 331
  4. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
  5. 2022Transformers are Sample-Efficient World Modelscited by 317
  6. 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
  7. 2022Autoformalization with Large Language Modelscited by 252
  8. 2023A Cookbook of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 248
  9. 2023A Survey on Self-supervised Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Future Trendscited by 205
  10. 2020Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Biascited by 183
  11. 2021Primer: Searching for Efficient Transformers for Language Modelingcited by 162
  12. 2021CrossFormer: A Versatile Vision Transformer Hinging on Cross-scale Attentioncited by 139
  13. 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 115
  14. 2023How do Language Models Bind Entities in Context?cited by 102
  15. 2020Neural Networks Fail to Learn Periodic Functions and How to Fix Itcited by 97
  16. 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalizationcited by 78
  17. 2019Graph Representations for Higher-Order Logic and Theorem Provingcited by 55
  18. 2020Conformal prediction for time seriescited by 53
  19. 2022Deep Symbolic Regression for Recurrent Sequencescited by 53
  20. 2023Magnushammer: A Transformer-Based Approach to Premise Selectioncited by 50
  21. 2017Deep Network Guided Proof Searchcited by 47
  22. 2021Constructions in combinatorics via neural networkscited by 46
  23. 2020Learning to Prove Theorems by Learning to Generate Theoremscited by 43
  24. 2023SNIP: Bridging Mathematical Symbolic and Numeric Realms with Unified Pre-trainingcited by 41
  25. 2019Exploration of Neural Machine Translation in Autoformalization of Mathematics in Mizarcited by 40
  26. 2020Learning to Unknotcited by 40
  27. 2023Multilingual Mathematical Autoformalizationcited by 38
  28. 2024A Review of Multi-Modal Large Language and Vision Modelscited by 30
  29. 2020Quiver Mutations, Seiberg Duality and Machine Learningcited by 19
  30. 2024Transforming the Bootstrap: Using Transformers to Compute Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Theorycited by 17
  31. 2021Machine Learning Calabi-Yau Hypersurfacescited by 15
  32. 2022Simplifying Polylogarithms with Machine Learningcited by 14
  33. 2024Transformer-Based Models Are Not Yet Perfect At Learning to Emulate Structural Recursioncited by 14
  34. 2021Learning knot invariants across dimensionscited by 12
  35. 2022SYMBA: Symbolic Computation of Squared Amplitudes in High Energy Physics with Machine Learningcited by 12
  36. 2023Searching for ribbons with machine learningcited by 11
  37. 2024Learn from Failure: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Trial-and-Error Data for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Provingcited by 11
  38. 2023Machine learning detects terminal singularitiescited by 9

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024FGeo-TP: A Language Model-Enhanced Solver for Geometry Problems
  2. 2026Versor: A Geometric Sequence Architecture
  3. 2026Breaking the Data Barrier in Learning Symbolic Computation: A Case Study on Variable Ordering Suggestion for Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition
  4. 2025CombiBench: Benchmarking LLM Capability for Combinatorial Mathematics
  5. 2026The Geometry of Thought: Disclosing the Transformer as a Tropical Polynomial Circuit
  6. 2026Euclid-Omni : A Unified Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Plane Geometry
  7. 2026Geometric Signatures of Reasoning: A Spectral Perspective on Task Hardness
  8. 2022UniGeo: Unifying Geometry Logical Reasoning via Reformulating Mathematical Expression