mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EVINCE: Optimizing Multi-LLM Dialogues Using Conditional Statistics and Information Theory

arXiv 2408.14575 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2024cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

EVINCE (Entropy and Variation IN Conditional Exchanges) is a novel framework for optimizing multi-LLM dialogues using conditional statistics and information theory. It addresses limitations in multi-agent debate (MAS) frameworks, where multiple LLMs chat without behavior modulation or mutual information quality assessment. Using dual entropy optimization to balance perspective diversity and prior knowledge, EVINCE provides quantitative tools to dynamically regulate LLM linguistic behaviors. When mutual information is low and both cross-entropy and Wasserstein distance are high, EVINCE promotes contentious dialogues to expose diverse perspectives and uncover inconsistencies. Conversely, as cross-entropy decreases and mutual information stabilizes, it transitions discussions into a conciliatory phase, encouraging compromise and acknowledgment of valid points. Using information-theoretic metrics and optimizing mutual information, EVINCE emerges as a structured and highly effective framework for multi-LLM collaboration.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2024.

Builds on

8 of 52 references.

References · 8

  1. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  2. 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 915
  3. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  4. 2023Improving Language Model Negotiation with Self-Play and In-Context Learning from AI Feedbackcited by 202
  5. 2024Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?cited by 153
  6. 2023Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Modelscited by 129
  7. 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMscited by 103
  8. 2023Prompting Large Language Models With the Socratic Methodcited by 43

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Optimizing for Persuasion Improves LLM Generalization: Evidence from Quality-Diversity Evolution of Debate Strategies
  2. 2024Gradual Vigilance and Interval Communication: Enhancing Value Alignment in Multi-Agent Debates
  3. 2026EvolMem: A Cognitive-Driven Benchmark for Multi-Session Dialogue Memory
  4. 2025From Belief Entrenchment to Robust Reasoning in LLM Agents
  5. 2025Beyond Single Models: Enhancing LLM Detection of Ambiguity in Requests through Debate
  6. 2026Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity
  7. 2026Breaking the Martingale Curse: Multi-Agent Debate via Asymmetric Cognitive Potential Energy
  8. 2026The Stepwise Informativeness Assumption: Why are Entropy Dynamics and Reasoning Correlated in LLMs?