Self-supervised Speech Representations Still Struggle with African American Vernacular English
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Underperformance of ASR systems for speakers of African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other marginalized language varieties is a well-documented phenomenon, and one that reinforces the stigmatization of these varieties. We investigate whether or not the recent wave of Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) speech models can close the gap in ASR performance between AAVE and Mainstream American English (MAE). We evaluate four SSL models (wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and XLS-R) on zero-shot Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for these two varieties and find that these models perpetuate the bias in performance against AAVE. Additionally, the models have higher word error rates on utterances with more phonological and morphosyntactic features of AAVE. Despite the success of SSL speech models in improving ASR for low resource varieties, SSL pre-training alone may not bridge the gap between AAVE and MAE. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/cmu-llab/s3m-aave.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2024.
Builds on
14 of 47 references.
References · 14
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 632
- 2022UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 381
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 258
- 2020DNSMOS: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality metric to evaluate Noise Suppressorscited by 235
- 2023Google USM: Scaling Automatic Speech Recognition Beyond 100 Languagescited by 228
- 2023Probing self-supervised speech models for phonetic and phonemic information: a case study in aspirationcited by 35
- 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech modelscited by 20
- 2022Opening the Black Box of wav2vec Feature Encodercited by 18
- 2022Accented Speech Recognition: Benchmarking, Pre-training, and Diverse Datacited by 15
- 2020Neural Representations for Modeling Variation in Speechcited by 14
- 2022Quantifying Language Variation Acoustically with Few Resourcescited by 12
- 2023Can Voice Assistants Be Microaggressors? Cross-Race Psychological Responses to Failures of Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Voxlect: A Speech Foundation Model Benchmark for Modeling Dialects and Regional Languages Around the Globecited by 5
- 2025The ML-SUPERB 2.0 Challenge: Towards Inclusive ASR Benchmarking for All Language Varietiescited by 4
- 2025Swivuriso: The South African Next Voices Multilingual Speech Datasetcited by 3
- 2025Automatic Speech Recognition of African American English: Lexical and Contextual Effectscited by 2
- 2024Dialetto, ma Quanto Dialetto? Transcribing and Evaluating Dialects on a Continuumcited by 1
- 2025A Sociophonetic Analysis of Racial Bias in Commercial ASR Systems Using the Pacific Northwest English Corpuscited by 1
- 2025Swivuriso: The South African Next Voices Multilingual Speech Dataset1 Dec 2025
- 2025A Sociophonetic Analysis of Racial Bias in Commercial ASR Systems Using the Pacific Northwest English Corpus26 Oct 2025
- 2025The ML-SUPERB 2.0 Challenge: Towards Inclusive ASR Benchmarking for All Language Varieties8 Sep 2025
- 2025Voxlect: A Speech Foundation Model Benchmark for Modeling Dialects and Regional Languages Around the Globe3 Aug 2025
- 2025Automatic Speech Recognition of African American English: Lexical and Contextual Effects7 Jun 2025
- 2024Dialetto, ma Quanto Dialetto? Transcribing and Evaluating Dialects on a Continuum18 Oct 2024