mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Representations for Modeling Variation in Speech

arXiv 2011.12649 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2020cs.CL eess.AScited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Variation in speech is often quantified by comparing phonetic transcriptions of the same utterance. However, manually transcribing speech is time-consuming and error prone. As an alternative, therefore, we investigate the extraction of acoustic embeddings from several self-supervised neural models. We use these representations to compute word-based pronunciation differences between non-native and native speakers of English, and between Norwegian dialect speakers. For comparison with several earlier studies, we evaluate how well these differences match human perception by comparing them with available human judgements of similarity. We show that speech representations extracted from a specific type of neural model (i.e. Transformers) lead to a better match with human perception than two earlier approaches on the basis of phonetic transcriptions and MFCC-based acoustic features. We furthermore find that features from the neural models can generally best be extracted from one of the middle hidden layers than from the final layer. We also demonstrate that neural speech representations not only capture segmental differences, but also intonational and durational differences that cannot adequately be represented by a set of discrete symbols used in phonetic transcriptions.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Making More of Little Data: Improving Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Using Data Augmentationcited by 30
  2. 2024Encoding of lexical tone in self-supervised models of spoken languagecited by 22
  3. 2022Quantifying Language Variation Acoustically with Few Resourcescited by 12
  4. 2024Predicting positive transfer for improved low-resource speech recognition using acoustic pseudo-tokenscited by 11
  5. 2024A Layer-Anchoring Strategy for Enhancing Cross-Lingual Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 6
  6. 2024Self-supervised Speech Representations Still Struggle with African American Vernacular Englishcited by 6
  7. 2026Prosodic ABX: A Language-Agnostic Method for Measuring Prosodic Contrast in Speech Representationscited by 3
  8. 2026Self-supervised Speech Comparison for L2 Phone, Rhythm, and Intonation Scoringcited by 2
  9. 2022Low-resource Accent Classification in Geographically-proximate Settings: A Forensic and Sociophonetics Perspectivecited by 1
  10. 2023Supervised Acoustic Embeddings And Their Transferability Across Languagescited by 1
  11. 2023From `Snippet-lects' to Doculects and Dialects: Leveraging Neural Representations of Speech for Placing Audio Signals in a Language Landscapecited by 1
  12. 2025Normalization through Fine-tuning: Understanding Wav2vec 2.0 Embeddings for Phonetic Analysiscited by 1
2 more
  1. 2025Probing for Phonology in Self-Supervised Speech Representations: A Case Study on Accent Perceptioncited by 0
  2. 2026Categorize Early, Integrate Late: Divergent Processing Strategies in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 0