mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Submodular Maximization Approaches for Equitable Client Selection in Federated Learning

arXiv 2408.13683 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a conventional Federated Learning framework, client selection for training typically involves the random sampling of a subset of clients in each iteration. However, this random selection often leads to disparate performance among clients, raising concerns regarding fairness, particularly in applications where equitable outcomes are crucial, such as in medical or financial machine learning tasks. This disparity typically becomes more pronounced with the advent of performance-centric client sampling techniques. This paper introduces two novel methods, namely SUBTRUNC and UNIONFL, designed to address the limitations of random client selection. Both approaches utilize submodular function maximization to achieve more balanced models. By modifying the facility location problem, they aim to mitigate the fairness concerns associated with random selection. SUBTRUNC leverages client loss information to diversify solutions, while UNIONFL relies on historical client selection data to ensure a more equitable performance of the final model. Moreover, these algorithms are accompanied by robust theoretical guarantees regarding convergence under reasonable assumptions. The efficacy of these methods is demonstrated through extensive evaluations across heterogeneous scenarios, revealing significant improvements in fairness as measured by a client dissimilarity metric.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2024.

Builds on

19 of 49 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  4. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
  5. 2019FedPAQ: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Method with Periodic Averaging and Quantizationcited by 349
  6. 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 312
  7. 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 196
  8. 2014Lazier Than Lazy Greedycited by 97
  9. 2020Faster Non-Convex Federated Learning via Global and Local Momentumcited by 48
  10. 2021Robust Training in High Dimensions via Block Coordinate Geometric Median Descentcited by 20
  11. 2020Discrete Signal Processing with Set Functionscited by 8
  12. 2018Randomized Greedy Sensor Selection: Leveraging Weak Submodularitycited by 6
7 more
  1. 2017A Randomized Greedy Algorithm for Near-Optimal Sensor Scheduling in Large-Scale Sensor Networkscited by 5
  2. 2023Improved Convergence Analysis and SNR Control Strategies for Federated Learning in the Presence of Noisecited by 4
  3. 2017Near-Optimal Sparse Sensing for Gaussian Detection with Correlated Observationscited by 3
  4. 2020Distributed Maximization of Submodular and Approximately Submodular Functionscited by 2
  5. 2024Randomized Greedy Methods for Weak Submodular Sensor Selection with Robustness Considerationscited by 2
  6. 2018Near-Optimal Distributed Estimation for a Network of Sensing Units Operating Under Communication Constraintscited by 1
  7. 2024Localized Distributional Robustness in Submodular Multi-Task Subset Selectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.