mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probing the Robustness of Vision-Language Pretrained Models: A Multimodal Adversarial Attack Approach

arXiv 2408.13461 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language pretraining (VLP) with transformers has demonstrated exceptional performance across numerous multimodal tasks. However, the adversarial robustness of these models has not been thoroughly investigated. Existing multimodal attack methods have largely overlooked cross-modal interactions between visual and textual modalities, particularly in the context of cross-attention mechanisms. In this paper, we study the adversarial vulnerability of recent VLP transformers and design a novel Joint Multimodal Transformer Feature Attack (JMTFA) that concurrently introduces adversarial perturbations in both visual and textual modalities under white-box settings. JMTFA strategically targets attention relevance scores to disrupt important features within each modality, generating adversarial samples by fusing perturbations and leading to erroneous model predictions. Experimental results indicate that the proposed approach achieves high attack success rates on vision-language understanding and reasoning downstream tasks compared to existing baselines. Notably, our findings reveal that the textual modality significantly influences the complex fusion processes within VLP transformers. Moreover, we observe no apparent relationship between model size and adversarial robustness under our proposed attacks. These insights emphasize a new dimension of adversarial robustness and underscore potential risks in the reliable deployment of multimodal AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 42 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2024.

Builds on

42 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023SA-Attack: Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Self-Augmentation8 Dec
  2. 2023OT-Attack: Enhancing Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Models via Optimal Transport Optimization7 Dec
  3. 2023Set-level Guidance Attack: Boosting Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models26 Jul
  4. 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Models19 Jun

Other references · 38

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  10. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  11. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  12. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,553
26 more
  1. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  2. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  3. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  4. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  5. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  6. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  7. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  8. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
  9. 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 556
  10. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
  11. 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 345
  12. 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 320
  13. 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
  14. 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 293
  15. 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 286
  16. 2021An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language Transformerscited by 271
  17. 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 213
  18. 2023Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attackscited by 194
  19. 2022A Survey of Vision-Language Pre-Trained Modelscited by 177
  20. 2022VLP: A Survey on Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 159
  21. 2021Feature Importance-aware Transferable Adversarial Attackscited by 127
  22. 2016Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 123
  23. 2019Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systemscited by 101
  24. 2021Bad Characters: Imperceptible NLP Attackscited by 71
  25. 2023VLATTACK: Multimodal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language Tasks via Pre-trained Modelscited by 68
  26. 2019FDA: Feature Disruptive Attackcited by 56

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Multimodal Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models by Leveraging One-To-Many Relationships
  2. 2024Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models through Collaborative Multimodal Interaction
  3. 2026Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models
  4. 2026Unveiling the Fragility of Vision-Language Models: Multi-Modal Adversarial Synergy via Texture-Constrained Perturbations and Cross-Modal Optimization
  5. 2023Exploring Transferability of Multimodal Adversarial Samples for Vision-Language Pre-training Models with Contrastive Learning
  6. 2024Revisiting the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models: a Multimodal Perspective
  7. 2025When Alignment Fails: Multimodal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2024Patch is Enough: Naturalistic Adversarial Patch against Vision-Language Pre-training Models