mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Non-convex matrix sensing: Breaking the quadratic rank barrier in the sample complexity

arXiv 2408.13276 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2024stat.ML cs.IT cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For the problem of reconstructing a low-rank matrix from a few linear measurements, two classes of algorithms have been widely studied in the literature: convex approaches based on nuclear norm minimization, and non-convex approaches that use factorized gradient descent. Under certain statistical model assumptions, it is known that nuclear norm minimization recovers the ground truth as soon as the number of samples scales linearly with the number of degrees of freedom of the ground-truth. In contrast, while non-convex approaches are computationally less expensive, existing recovery guarantees assume that the number of samples scales at least quadratically with the rank r of the ground-truth matrix. In this paper, we close this gap by showing that the non-convex approaches can be as efficient as nuclear norm minimization in terms of sample complexity. Namely, we consider the problem of reconstructing a positive semidefinite matrix from a few Gaussian measurements. We show that factorized gradient descent with spectral initialization converges to the ground truth at a linear rate as soon as the number of samples scales with Omega (rdkappa2), where d is the dimension, and kappa is the condition number of the ground truth matrix. This improves the previous rank-dependence in the sample complexity of non-convex matrix factorization from quadratic to linear. Furthermore, we extend our theory to the noisy setting, where we show that with noisy measurements, factorized gradient descent with spectral initialization converges to the minimax optimal error up to a factor linear in kappa. Our proof relies on a probabilistic decoupling argument, where we show that the gradient descent iterates are only weakly dependent on the individual entries of the measurement matrices. We expect that our proof technique is of independent interest for other non-convex problems.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.

Builds on

23 of 53 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 159
  2. 2016Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimumcited by 124
  3. 2020Spectral Methods for Data Science: A Statistical Perspectivecited by 111
  4. 2015Low-rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Procrustes Flowcited by 97
  5. 2014Guaranteed Matrix Completion via Non-convex Factorizationcited by 81
  6. 2016Global Optimality of Local Search for Low Rank Matrix Recoverycited by 81
  7. 2021Small random initialization is akin to spectral learning: Optimization and generalization guarantees for overparameterized low-rank matrix reconstructioncited by 77
  8. 2017Gradient Descent Can Take Exponential Time to Escape Saddle Pointscited by 74
  9. 2018Gradient Descent with Random Initialization: Fast Global Convergence for Nonconvex Phase Retrievalcited by 71
  10. 2020Accelerating Ill-Conditioned Low-Rank Matrix Estimation via Scaled Gradient Descentcited by 70
  11. 2017Implicit Regularization in Nonconvex Statistical Estimation: Gradient Descent Converges Linearly for Phase Retrieval, Matrix Completion, and Blind Deconvolutioncited by 63
  12. 2023Understanding Incremental Learning of Gradient Descent: A Fine-grained Analysis of Matrix Sensingcited by 40
11 more
  1. 2016Non-square matrix sensing without spurious local minima via the Burer-Monteiro approachcited by 38
  2. 2016Convergence Analysis for Rectangular Matrix Completion Using Burer-Monteiro Factorization and Gradient Descentcited by 37
  3. 2015A Convergent Gradient Descent Algorithm for Rank Minimization and Semidefinite Programming from Random Linear Measurementscited by 34
  4. 2023The Power of Preconditioning in Overparameterized Low-Rank Matrix Sensingcited by 32
  5. 2019Low-rank matrix recovery with composite optimization: good conditioning and rapid convergencecited by 31
  6. 2021On the computational and statistical complexity of over-parameterized matrix sensingcited by 31
  7. 2019Sharp Restricted Isometry Bounds for the Inexistence of Spurious Local Minima in Nonconvex Matrix Recoverycited by 26
  8. 2022Randomly Initialized Alternating Least Squares: Fast Convergence for Matrix Sensingcited by 11
  9. 2021GNMR: A provable one-line algorithm for low rank matrix recoverycited by 10
  10. 2024Convergence of Gradient Descent with Small Initialization for Unregularized Matrix Completioncited by 6
  11. 2023Implicit Regularization Makes Overparameterized Asymmetric Matrix Sensing Robust to Perturbationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.