mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaled Gradient Descent for Ill-Conditioned Low-Rank Matrix Recovery with Optimal Sampling Complexity

arXiv 2604.00060 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026stat.ML cs.IT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The low-rank matrix recovery problem seeks to reconstruct an unknown n1 × n2 rank-r matrix from m linear measurements, where mll n1n2. This problem has been extensively studied over the past few decades, leading to a variety of algorithms with solid theoretical guarantees. Among these, gradient descent based non-convex methods have become particularly popular due to their computational efficiency. However, these methods typically suffer from two key limitations: a sub-optimal sample complexity of O((n1 + n2)r2) and an iteration complexity of O(kappa log(1/ε)) to achieve ε-accuracy, resulting in slow convergence when the target matrix is ill-conditioned. Here, kappa denotes the condition number of the unknown matrix. Recent studies show that a preconditioned variant of GD, known as scaled gradient descent (ScaledGD), can significantly reduce the iteration complexity to O(log(1/ε)). Nonetheless, its sample complexity remains sub-optimal at O((n1 + n2)r2). In contrast, a delicate virtual sequence technique demonstrates that the standard GD in the positive semidefinite (PSD) setting achieves the optimal sample complexity O((n1 + n2)r), but converges more slowly with an iteration complexity O(kappa2 log(1/ε)). In this paper, through a more refined analysis, we show that ScaledGD achieves both the optimal sample complexity O((n1 + n2)r) and the improved iteration complexity O(log(1/ε)). Notably, our results extend beyond the PSD setting to general low-rank matrix recovery problem. Numerical experiments further validate that ScaledGD accelerates convergence for ill-conditioned matrices with the optimal sampling complexity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018Algorithmic Regularization in Learning Deep Homogeneous Models: Layers are Automatically Balancedcited by 177
  2. 2020Spectral Methods for Data Science: A Statistical Perspectivecited by 112
  3. 2015Low-rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Procrustes Flowcited by 97
  4. 2021Small random initialization is akin to spectral learning: Optimization and generalization guarantees for overparameterized low-rank matrix reconstructioncited by 78
  5. 2020Accelerating Ill-Conditioned Low-Rank Matrix Estimation via Scaled Gradient Descentcited by 71
  6. 2019Noisy Matrix Completion: Understanding Statistical Guarantees for Convex Relaxation via Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 58
  7. 2016The non-convex Burer-Monteiro approach works on smooth semidefinite programscited by 46
  8. 2014Non-convex Robust PCAcited by 41
  9. 2016Non-square matrix sensing without spurious local minima via the Burer-Monteiro approachcited by 38
  10. 2023The Power of Preconditioning in Overparameterized Low-Rank Matrix Sensingcited by 33
  11. 2019Low-rank matrix recovery with composite optimization: good conditioning and rapid convergencecited by 31
  12. 2020Low-Rank Matrix Recovery with Scaled Subgradient Methods: Fast and Robust Convergence Without the Condition Numbercited by 28
6 more
  1. 2018Harnessing Structures in Big Data via Guaranteed Low-Rank Matrix Estimationcited by 25
  2. 2022Preconditioned Gradient Descent for Overparameterized Nonconvex Burer--Monteiro Factorization with Global Optimality Certificationcited by 21
  3. 2025Preconditioned Gradient Descent for Over-Parameterized Nonconvex Matrix Factorizationcited by 12
  4. 2020The Global Geometry of Centralized and Distributed Low-rank Matrix Recovery without Regularizationcited by 7
  5. 2019Multi-View Matrix Completion for Multi-Label Image Classificationcited by 6
  6. 2024Non-convex matrix sensing: Breaking the quadratic rank barrier in the sample complexitycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.