mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models

arXiv 2408.12494 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but they have also been observed to magnify societal biases, particularly those related to gender. In response to this issue, several benchmarks have been proposed to assess gender bias in LLMs. However, these benchmarks often lack practical flexibility or inadvertently introduce biases. To address these shortcomings, we introduce GenderCARE, a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics for quantifying and mitigating gender bias in LLMs. To begin, we establish pioneering criteria for gender equality benchmarks, spanning dimensions such as inclusivity, diversity, explainability, objectivity, robustness, and realisticity. Guided by these criteria, we construct GenderPair, a novel pair-based benchmark designed to assess gender bias in LLMs comprehensively. Our benchmark provides standardized and realistic evaluations, including previously overlooked gender groups such as transgender and non-binary individuals. Furthermore, we develop effective debiasing techniques that incorporate counterfactual data augmentation and specialized fine-tuning strategies to reduce gender bias in LLMs without compromising their overall performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate a significant reduction in various gender bias benchmarks, with reductions peaking at over 90% and averaging above 35% across 17 different LLMs. Importantly, these reductions come with minimal variability in mainstream language tasks, remaining below 2%. By offering a realistic assessment and tailored reduction of gender biases, we hope that our GenderCARE can represent a significant step towards achieving fairness and equity in LLMs. More details are available at https://github.com/kstanghere/GenderCARE-ccs24.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.

Builds on

23 of 56 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  3. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
  4. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  5. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  6. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  7. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  8. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
  9. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  10. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
  11. 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
  12. 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 185
11 more
  1. 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
  2. 2018Abstractive Summarization of Reddit Posts with Multi-level Memory Networkscited by 102
  3. 2021Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexitycited by 77
  4. 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generationcited by 56
  5. 2023WinoQueer: A Community-in-the-Loop Benchmark for Anti-LGBTQ+ Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 42
  6. 2022Quantifying Social Biases Using Templates is Unreliablecited by 38
  7. 2023Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AIcited by 33
  8. 2022Why So Toxic? Measuring and Triggering Toxic Behavior in Open-Domain Chatbotscited by 31
  9. 2023On Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Biases in Multilingual Settingscited by 31
  10. 2023Latent Imitator: Generating Natural Individual Discriminatory Instances for Black-Box Fairness Testingcited by 23
  11. 2023FAIRER: Fairness as Decision Rationale Alignmentcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

9 papers.