Preference-Guided Reflective Sampling for Aligning Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Iterative data generation and model re-training can effectively align large language models(LLMs) to human preferences. The process of data sampling is crucial, as it significantly influences the success of policy improvement. Repeated random sampling is a widely used method that independently queries the model multiple times to generate outputs. In this work, we propose a more effective sampling method, named Preference-Guided Reflective Sampling (PRS). Unlike random sampling, PRS employs a tree-based generation framework to enable more efficient sampling. It leverages adaptive self-refinement techniques to better explore the sampling space. By specifying user preferences in natural language, PRS can further optimize response generation according to these preferences. As a result, PRS can align models to diverse user preferences. Our experiments demonstrate that PRS generates higher-quality responses with significantly higher rewards. On AlpacaEval and Arena-Hard, PRS substantially outperforms repeated random sampling in best-of-N sampling. Moreover, PRS shows strong performance when applied in iterative offline RL training.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.
Builds on
24 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Models9 Oct
- 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision4 May
Other references · 22
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
10 more
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
- 2023Alphazero-like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and Trainingcited by 291
- 2017Toward Controlled Generation of Textcited by 271
- 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 271
- 2023Training Language Models with Language Feedback at Scalecited by 125
- 2023COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Taskscited by 69
- 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Controllable Generation under Diversified Instructionscited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoningcited by 40
- 2025Finding the Sweet Spot: Preference Data Construction for Scaling Preference Optimizationcited by 9
- 2024Multi-Agent Sampling: Scaling Inference Compute for Data Synthesis with Tree Search-Based Agentic Collaborationcited by 8
- 2026Structuring the Space of Sociotechnical Alignmentcited by 2
- 2026Structuring the Space of Sociotechnical Alignment2 Jun 2026
- 2025Finding the Sweet Spot: Preference Data Construction for Scaling Preference Optimization24 Feb 2025
- 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoning5 Jan 2025
- 2024Multi-Agent Sampling: Scaling Inference Compute for Data Synthesis with Tree Search-Based Agentic Collaboration22 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference Optimization
- 2025Clear Preferences Leave Traces: Reference Model-Guided Sampling for Preference Learning
- 2024West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models
- 2026How Sampling Shapes LLM Alignment: From One-Shot Optima to Iterative Dynamics
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHF
- 2024Investigating on RLHF methodology
- 2025HPS: Hard Preference Sampling for Human Preference Alignment