mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Efficient Formal Verification of Spiking Neural Network

arXiv 2408.10900 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2024cs.AI cs.ET cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, AI research has primarily focused on large language models (LLMs), and increasing accuracy often involves scaling up and consuming more power. The power consumption of AI has become a significant societal issue; in this context, spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer a promising solution. SNNs operate event-driven, like the human brain, and compress information temporally. These characteristics allow SNNs to significantly reduce power consumption compared to perceptron-based artificial neural networks (ANNs), highlighting them as a next-generation neural network technology. However, societal concerns regarding AI go beyond power consumption, with the reliability of AI models being a global issue. For instance, adversarial attacks on AI models are a well-studied problem in the context of traditional neural networks. Despite their importance, the stability and property verification of SNNs remains in the early stages of research. Most SNN verification methods are time-consuming and barely scalable, making practical applications challenging. In this paper, we introduce temporal encoding to achieve practical performance in verifying the adversarial robustness of SNNs. We conduct a theoretical analysis of this approach and demonstrate its success in verifying SNNs at previously unmanageable scales. Our contribution advances SNN verification to a practical level, facilitating the safer application of SNNs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  6. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
  7. 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 381
  8. 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 259
  9. 2019Spiking-YOLO: Spiking Neural Network for Energy-Efficient Object Detectioncited by 177
  10. 2023From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inferencecited by 170
  11. 2019Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verificationcited by 138
  12. 2013Multi-digit Number Recognition from Street View Imagery using Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 84
9 more
  1. 2016Supervised learning based on temporal coding in spiking neural networkscited by 76
  2. 2016Towards deep learning with segregated dendritescited by 71
  3. 2021Introduction to Neural Network Verificationcited by 63
  4. 2019Temporal-Coded Deep Spiking Neural Network with Easy Training and Robust Performancecited by 46
  5. 2022Toward Robust Spiking Neural Network Against Adversarial Perturbationcited by 12
  6. 2023Adversarially Robust Spiking Neural Networks Through Conversioncited by 7
  7. 2018Spiking Neural Networks modelled as Timed Automata with parameter learningcited by 4
  8. 2022Timing-Based Backpropagation in Spiking Neural Networks Without Single-Spike Restrictionscited by 3
  9. 2024Robust and Efficient Adversarial Defense in SNNs via Image Purification and Joint Detectioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.