Ferret: Faster and Effective Automated Red Teaming with Reward-Based Scoring Technique
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
In today's era, where large language models (LLMs) are integrated into numerous real-world applications, ensuring their safety and robustness is crucial for responsible AI usage. Automated red-teaming methods play a key role in this process by generating adversarial attacks to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities in these models. However, existing methods often struggle with slow performance, limited categorical diversity, and high resource demands. While Rainbow Teaming, a recent approach, addresses the diversity challenge by framing adversarial prompt generation as a quality-diversity search, it remains slow and requires a large fine-tuned mutator for optimal performance. To overcome these limitations, we propose Ferret, a novel approach that builds upon Rainbow Teaming by generating multiple adversarial prompt mutations per iteration and using a scoring function to rank and select the most effective adversarial prompt. We explore various scoring functions, including reward models, Llama Guard, and LLM-as-a-judge, to rank adversarial mutations based on their potential harm to improve the efficiency of the search for harmful mutations. Our results demonstrate that Ferret, utilizing a reward model as a scoring function, improves the overall attack success rate (ASR) to 95%, which is 46% higher than Rainbow Teaming. Additionally, Ferret reduces the time needed to achieve a 90% ASR by 15.2% compared to the baseline and generates adversarial prompts that are transferable i.e. effective on other LLMs of larger size. Our codes are available at https://github.com/declare-lab/ferret.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 10 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.
Builds on
10 of 21 references.
References · 10
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulationcited by 202
- 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
- 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 189
- 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 161
- 2024Ruby Teaming: Improving Quality Diversity Search with Memory for Automated Red Teamingcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025RainbowPlus: Enhancing Adversarial Prompt Generation via Evolutionary Quality-Diversity Searchcited by 10
- 2024Recent advancements in LLM Red-Teaming: Techniques, Defenses, and Ethical Considerationscited by 8
- 2025Quality-Diversity Red-Teaming: Automated Generation of High-Quality and Diverse Attackers for Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teamingcited by 8
- 2026ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward Systemcited by 0
- 2026One Turn Too Late: Learning When to Intervene Against Multi-Turn Malicious Intentcited by 0
- 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AIcited by 0
- 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI7 May 2026
- 2026One Turn Too Late: Learning When to Intervene Against Multi-Turn Malicious Intent7 May 2026
- 2026ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward System20 Apr 2026
- 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teaming3 Sep 2025
- 2025Quality-Diversity Red-Teaming: Automated Generation of High-Quality and Diverse Attackers for Large Language Models8 Jun 2025
- 2025RainbowPlus: Enhancing Adversarial Prompt Generation via Evolutionary Quality-Diversity Search21 Apr 2025
- 2024Recent advancements in LLM Red-Teaming: Techniques, Defenses, and Ethical Considerations9 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025RedTopic: Toward Topic-Diverse Red Teaming of Large Language Models
- 2024Gradient-Based Language Model Red Teaming
- 2024Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Tester
- 2026CHASE: Adversarial Red-Blue Teaming for Improving LLM Safety using Reinforcement Learning
- 2026GPT-Red: Automated Red Teaming via Self-Play at Scale
- 2026OpenRT: An Open-Source Red Teaming Framework for Multimodal LLMs
- 2024ASTPrompter: Preference-Aligned Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Generate Low-Perplexity Unsafe Prompts
- 2026TreeTeaming: Autonomous Red-Teaming of Vision-Language Models via Hierarchical Strategy Exploration