GoNoGo: An Efficient LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Streamlining Automotive Software Release Decision-Making
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional methods for making software deployment decisions in the automotive industry typically rely on manual analysis of tabular software test data. These methods often lead to higher costs and delays in the software release cycle due to their labor-intensive nature. Large Language Models (LLMs) present a promising solution to these challenges. However, their application generally demands multiple rounds of human-driven prompt engineering, which limits their practical deployment, particularly for industrial end-users who need reliable and efficient results. In this paper, we propose GoNoGo, an LLM agent system designed to streamline automotive software deployment while meeting both functional requirements and practical industrial constraints. Unlike previous systems, GoNoGo is specifically tailored to address domain-specific and risk-sensitive systems. We evaluate GoNoGo's performance across different task difficulties using zero-shot and few-shot examples taken from industrial practice. Our results show that GoNoGo achieves a 100% success rate for tasks up to Level 2 difficulty with 3-shot examples, and maintains high performance even for more complex tasks. We find that GoNoGo effectively automates decision-making for simpler tasks, significantly reducing the need for manual intervention. In summary, GoNoGo represents an efficient and user-friendly LLM-based solution currently employed in our industrial partner's company to assist with software release decision-making, supporting more informed and timely decisions in the release process for risk-sensitive vehicle systems.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.
Builds on
27 of 42 references.
References · 27
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
- 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 593
15 more
- 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 554
- 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 308
- 2022TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Modelscited by 273
- 2024Why Tabular Foundation Models Should Be a Research Prioritycited by 103
- 2024TableLLM: Enabling Tabular Data Manipulation by LLMs in Real Office Usage Scenarioscited by 76
- 2023Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agentscited by 72
- 2023Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Predictioncited by 55
- 2024Elephants Never Forget: Memorization and Learning of Tabular Data in Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2024Fine Tuning LLM for Enterprise: Practical Guidelines and Recommendationscited by 28
- 2024TAT-LLM: A Specialized Language Model for Discrete Reasoning over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 19
- 2024A Survey on Self-Supervised Learning for Non-Sequential Tabular Datacited by 15
- 2024Unlock the Potential of Large Language Models for Predictive Tabular Tasks in Data Science with Table-Specific Pretrainingcited by 12
- 2024DP-TabICL: In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Tabular Datacited by 11
- 2023Rethinking Pre-Training in Tabular Data: A Neighborhood Embedding Perspectivecited by 7
- 2024DataFrame QA: A Universal LLM Framework on DataFrame Question Answering Without Data Exposurecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomycited by 8
- 2025GateLens: A Reasoning-Enhanced LLM Agent for Automotive Software Release Analyticscited by 4
- 2025Designing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering Tasks: Quality Attributes, Design Patterns and Rationalecited by 3
- 2026The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SEcited by 2
- 2026Automated Summarization of Software Documents: An LLM-based Multi-Agent Approachcited by 1
- 2026Assistance to Autonomy: A Systematic Literature Review of Agentic AI across the Software Development Life Cyclecited by 0
- 2026Automated Summarization of Software Documents: An LLM-based Multi-Agent Approach23 Jun 2026
- 2026Assistance to Autonomy: A Systematic Literature Review of Agentic AI across the Software Development Life Cycle14 May 2026
- 2026The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE16 Apr 2026
- 2025Designing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering Tasks: Quality Attributes, Design Patterns and Rationale11 Nov 2025
- 2025GateLens: A Reasoning-Enhanced LLM Agent for Automotive Software Release Analytics27 Mar 2025
- 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomy1 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Querying Large Automotive Software Models: Agentic vs. Direct LLM Approaches
- 2026Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report
- 2024CodePori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology
- 2024LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead
- 2026The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration
- 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents
- 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey
- 2026LLM-Based Agentic Systems for Software Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities