mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Invariant Principle for Heterophilic Graph Structure Distribution Shifts

arXiv 2408.09490 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Heterophilic Graph Neural Networks (HGNNs) have shown promising results for semi-supervised learning tasks on graphs. Notably, most real-world heterophilic graphs are composed of a mixture of nodes with different neighbor patterns, exhibiting local node-level homophilic and heterophilic structures. However, existing works are only devoted to designing better HGNN backbones or architectures for node classification tasks on heterophilic and homophilic graph benchmarks simultaneously, and their analyses of HGNN performance with respect to nodes are only based on the determined data distribution without exploring the effect caused by this structural difference between training and testing nodes. How to learn invariant node representations on heterophilic graphs to handle this structure difference or distribution shifts remains unexplored. In this paper, we first discuss the limitations of previous graph-based invariant learning methods from the perspective of data augmentation. Then, we propose HEI, a framework capable of generating invariant node representations through incorporating heterophily information to infer latent environments without augmentation, which are then used for invariant prediction, under heterophilic graph structure distribution shifts. We theoretically show that our proposed method can achieve guaranteed performance under heterophilic graph structure distribution shifts. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks and backbones can also demonstrate the effectiveness of our method compared with existing state-of-the-art baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/Yangjinluan/HEI

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2024.

Builds on

36 of 51 references.

References · 36

  1. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  2. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  3. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
  4. 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 821
  5. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  6. 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 679
  7. 2020Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Networkcited by 592
  8. 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
  9. 2019MixHop: Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Architectures via Sparsified Neighborhood Mixingcited by 442
  10. 2021Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methodscited by 309
  11. 2022Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
  12. 2022Finding Global Homophily in Graph Neural Networks When Meeting Heterophilycited by 179
24 more
  1. 2022Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Surveycited by 175
  2. 2022Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
  3. 2022Handling Distribution Shifts on Graphs: An Invariance Perspectivecited by 163
  4. 2022Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphscited by 144
  5. 2022GOOD: A Graph Out-of-Distribution Benchmarkcited by 140
  6. 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
  7. 2020Node Similarity Preserving Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 112
  8. 2021Breaking the Limit of Graph Neural Networks by Improving the Assortativity of Graphs with Local Mixing Patternscited by 95
  9. 2021Shift-Robust GNNs: Overcoming the Limitations of Localized Graph Training Datacited by 86
  10. 2021Is Heterophily A Real Nightmare For Graph Neural Networks To Do Node Classification?cited by 82
  11. 2022Graph Rationalization with Environment-based Augmentationscited by 70
  12. 2020Empirical or Invariant Risk Minimization? A Sample Complexity Perspectivecited by 62
  13. 2022ZIN: When and How to Learn Invariance Without Environment Partition?cited by 58
  14. 2021Topology-Imbalance Learning for Semi-Supervised Node Classificationcited by 56
  15. 2021Pareto Self-Supervised Training for Few-Shot Learningcited by 52
  16. 2023Structural Re-weighting Improves Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 45
  17. 2023Does Invariant Graph Learning via Environment Augmentation Learn Invariance?cited by 42
  18. 2023Demystifying Structural Disparity in Graph Neural Networks: Can One Size Fit All?cited by 41
  19. 2021Tree Decomposed Graph Neural Networkcited by 35
  20. 2021Block Modeling-Guided Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 32
  21. 2024Alleviating Structural Distribution Shift in Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 31
  22. 2024Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Causal Interventioncited by 30
  23. 2023LSGNN: Towards General Graph Neural Network in Node Classification by Local Similaritycited by 15
  24. 2024Discovering Invariant Neighborhood Patterns for Heterophilic Graphscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.